Int J Curr Pharm Res, Vol 18, Issue 1, 112-115Original Article

ROLE OF DEFLAZACORT AS AN ADJUVANT TO TAMSULOSIN IN ENHANCING EXPULSION OF MIDDLE AND LOWER URETERIC CALCULI: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

PIYUSH SINGH*, SHIKHA SINGH

Department of General Surgery, People’s Medical College and Research Center, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
*Corresponding author: Piyush Singh; *Email: kunwar.piyush6@gmail.com

Received: 10 Oct 2025, Revised and Accepted: 28 Nov 2025


ABSTRACT

Objective: Ureteric calculi constitute a significant proportion of urolithiasis cases and commonly present with acute colicky pain, urinary symptoms, and recurrent morbidity. Medical expulsive therapy (MET) using α-blockers such as tamsulosin is widely practiced; however, adjunctive corticosteroids may further facilitate stone passage by reducing ureteric edema and inflammation. This study evaluates the effectiveness of combining deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin monotherapy in enhancing expulsion of middle and lower ureteric stones.

Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at People’s Hospital, Bhopal, from November 2022 to March 2024. A total of 170 eligible patients with unilateral middle or lower ureteric calculi (4–8 mm) were randomized into two groups: group A received tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily plus deflazacort (6 mg twice daily for 2 w, tapered to 6 mg once daily for 2 more weeks), and group B received tamsulosin monotherapy. Patients were followed for up to 4 w, with serial assessment of stone expulsion, analgesic requirement, and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v26, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Results: Stone expulsion at 3 w was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (23.5% vs. 7.1%; p<0.01). By 4 w, expulsion rates further increased to 88.2% versus 52.9%, respectively (p<0.01). The overall treatment success rate was markedly superior in Group A (90.4%) compared to Group B (56.1%; p<0.01). Analgesic requirements were significantly lower with combination therapy (mean 4.59 vs. 6.38 doses; p<0.01). Adverse events were mild and comparable between groups.

Conclusion: Deflazacort as an adjunct to tamsulosin significantly enhances stone expulsion rates, accelerates clearance, and reduces analgesic use without increasing adverse effects. Combined MET is a safe and effective strategy for middle and lower ureteric calculi.

Keywords: Tamsulosin, Deflazacort, Medical expulsive therapy, Ureteric calculi, Stone expulsion, Urolithiasis


INTRODUCTION

Urolithiasis is the formation of stones within the urinary tract, notably in the kidneys, ureters, bladder, or urethra. This condition, characterized by the development of kidney stones, is a painful urological disorder that impacts over 12% of the global population. Recurrence rates are significantly high; for males, they range from 70% to 81%, while for females, they fall between 47% and 60%. An evaluation indicates that at least 10% of individuals in industrialized areas are dealing with urinary stone formation [1, 2].

Stones situated in the mid-ureter typically cause pain that radiates forward, whereas those located in the lower ureter produce discomfort that may extend to the groin due to referred pain stemming from either the genitofemoral or ilioinguinal nerves. Additionally, calculi at the ureter vesical junction can lead to irritative voiding symptoms such as dysuria (painful urination) and increased urinary frequency [3, 4].

Among all types of urinary tract stones, approximately 22% are found in the ureter, with a significant 68% occurring in its distal section. The initial symptom associated with ureteric stones often presents as colicky pain; nearly half of patients experience this discomfort within five years following stone formation. Most patients report symptoms between their thirties and sixties, with peak incidence noted between ages 35 and 45 [5, 6].

Over recent decades, advancements in minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized the management of ureteral stones. Nonetheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that these procedures carry potential risks and can incur high costs.

Numerous studies have explored the impact of corticosteroids on ureteric stones [6, 7]. These agents exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-edema effects. The presence of stones can induce inflammation in the mucosal lining, leading to swelling. To address or avert these inflammatory responses and facilitate stone passage from the body, corticosteroids may be utilized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a Prospective Observational Analytical Study conducted at Department of General Surgery of People’s Hospital, Bhopal, associated with Peoples College Medical Sciences and Research Centre Bhopal. All patients who have been diagnosed with middle or lower ureteric calculi, who match the inclusion criteria, and who are willing to participate in the study are included in the study between November 2022 to March 2024.

Sample size is calculated using following formulae:

n=(Zα/2+Zβ)xPQ*2/d2

So, by rounding off, we took 8 5 subjectsin each group i. e. a total of 170 subjects.

Eligibility criteria for inclusion were: patients over 18 y of age, both male and female, with unilateral ureteric stones sized 4-8 mm, no active urinary tract infection (UTI), no previous surgeries for ureteric calculi, and normal renal function tests.

Exclusion criteria included morbid obesity (BMI above 40), diabetes, multiple stones, pregnancy, paediatric patients, solitary functioning kidney, deranged renal function tests, previous stone disease surgeries (ESWL/PCNL), and obstructive uropathy.

Methods

Study was commenced after approval from Institutional ethical committee. A total of 170 patients of ureteric calculi presenting at our hospital, meeting the eligibility criteria were taken for study after informed consent. After detailed history, examination, and investigations as per standard hospital protocol, cases were divided into two treatment arms using computer generated random numbers, the investigator were not be choosing the procedure:

GroupA:-patients were given Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day for 2 w and tab deflazacort (6 mg BD for 2 w then the dose was tapered on 6 mg OD for another 2 w)

Group B:-patients were given monotherapy of Tab Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily for 2 w.

Statistical analysis

The analysis of statistical data was carried out with SPSS Version 26.0, while graphical representations were constructed using Microsoft Excel 2021. Qualitative data was presented in terms of frequency and percentage. The relationships among qualitative variables were assessed through the Chi-Square test. Quantitative data was reported as mean values accompanied by standard deviations. For comparing quantitative data between the two groups, an unpaired t-test was employed if the data met the 'Normality test' criteria; otherwise, the Mann-Whitney Test was applied. A significance threshold of p-value<0.05 was established, and results were visually represented where deemed appropriate.

RESULTS

A cohort of 170 eligible patients was successfully enrolled and randomised in a 1:1 ratio into the two treatment groups. Baseline characteristics, including demographic and clinical variables, were comparable across both groups, confirming effective randomisation. Table 1 presents the distribution of subjects and the corresponding therapeutic assignments.

Table 1: Distribution of study groups
Group N %
Deflazacort+Tamsulosin (GroupA) 85 50.0%
Tamsulosin (Group B) 85 50.0%
Total 170 100.0%

Present study included 170 patients diagnosed as having middle or lower ureteric calculi, meeting the inclusion criteria and willing to participate in study. They were divided into two treatment arms using computer-generated random numbers, the investigator was not be choosing the procedure: Group A patients were given Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day and Tab Deflazacort (6 mg BD for 2 w then the dose was tapered on 6 mg OD for another 2 w). Group 2 patients were given monotherapy of Tab Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day.

Table 2: Comparison of study groups asper mean dose of analgesics

Variables Group N Mean SD p-value

Mean doses of analgesic (1-

dose 50 mg Diclo)

A 85 4.59 1.57 <0.01
B 85 6.38 2.12

Mean requirement of analgesics was significantly more in group B cases i. e. cases managed by tamsulosin monotherapy as compared to group A i. e. cases managed by combined therapy of tamsulosin with deflazacort (6.38 vs 4.59; p<0.01).

Table 3: Comparison of study groups asper any other intervention

Any other intervention Group Total
A B
Yes 7 6
8.2% 7.1%
No 78 79
91.8% 92.9%
Total 85 85
100.0% 100.0%
p-value-1.0

Supplementary interventions from stone expulsion were required in 8.2% cases of group A as compared to 7.1% cases of group B (p-1.0).

Table 4: Comparison of study groups as per location of calculus

USG-KUB(location of calculus) 2 w 3 w* 4 w*
A B A
Mid-ureter 37 38 6
43.5% 44.7% 7.1%
Distal ureter 48 47 59
56.5% 55.3% 69.4%
No stone visible 0 0 20
0.0% 0.0% 23.5%
Total 85 85 85
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
p-value 1.00 <0.01 <0.01

*1 case was excluded from study after 2nd week and 4 cases after 3rd week due to ADRs, Stone expulsion after 3 w was observed in 23.5% cases of group A as compared to 7.1% in group B (p<0.01). By end of 4 w, stone expulsion rate was 88.2% in group A as compared to 52.9% in group B (p<0.01).

Table 5: Comparison of study groups as per final outcome

Outcome Group Total l
A B
Successful 75 46
90.4% 56.1%
Unsuccessful 8 36
9.6% 43.9%
Total 83 82
100.0% 100.0%
p-value<0.01

*5 cases were excluded from study due to ADRS, Success as medical expulsive therapy for stone clearance was observed to be significantly higher in cases managed by combined therapy of tamsulosin with deflazacort as compared to tamsulosin monotherapy (90.4% vs 43.9%; p<0.01).

Table 6: Comparison of study groups as per adverse events

Adverse events Group Total p-value
A B
Flushing 3 0 3
3.5% 0.0% 1.8%
Frequent urination 3 4 7
3.5% 4.7% 4.1%
Headache 5 7 12
5.9% 8.2% 7.1%
Light headedness 4 2 6
4.7% 2.4% 3.5%
None 70 70 140
82.4% 82.4% 82.4%

Both the groups were comparable with regards to adverse reactions (p>0.05). Incidence of flushing was 3.5% vs 0%, frequent urination was 3.5% vs 4.7%, headache was 5.9% vs 8.2% and light-headedness was 4.7% vs 2.4%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The ejection of calculi is influenced by several parameters, including the size, form, and position of the stone, as well as ureteric oedema and ureteric convolutions. The most crucial parameters among them are the placement and magnitude of the calculus.

In the present period, the care of patients with ureteral calculi has undergone significant changes. The primary emphasis is now on a conservative approach, which offers the main advantage of minimising patient morbidity. Typically, conservative non-surgical methods are used to treat distal ureteral stones that are 5-10 mm in size, as they are unlikely to pass on their own [8, 9]

More than 50% of the cases in the current research were in the age range of 31-40 y, with an average age of 39.4 y (p=0.74). The present study showed a higher proportion of men, accounting for 67.1% of the participants, compared to females who accounted for 32.9% (p-0.625). The findings of our study align with previous research, which indicates that the majority of instances involving ureteric calculus occur in individuals in their third decade of life. Additionally, males seem to be more impacted than females [10-12]. Multiple investigations have demonstrated that experiencing severe pain in the side of the body and the lower abdomen on the same side, which spreads to the testicles or the vulvar area, is a distinct symptom of a ureteric calculus. The primary symptom in the majority of patients is lower abdominal discomfort [13-15].

Analgesics were necessary in nearly all cases in both groups (p-1.0). The average need for pain relievers was substantially higher in group B cases, which were treated with only tamsulosin, compared to group A cases, which were treated with a combination of tamsulosin and deflazacort (6.38 vs 4.59; p<0.01). Sinha AR et al. [16] reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients receiving combination treatment (group I) and monotherapy (group II). Retrograde ejaculation was seen in 3 (6%) patients in Group I, whereas nausea was reported by 6 (12%) patients, dizziness by 4 (8%) patients, headache by 7 (14%) patients, vomiting by

5 (10%) patients, constipation by 6 (12%) patients, nasal congestion by 2 (4%) patients, and diarrhoea by 1 (2%) patient. Retrograde ejaculation was seen in 2 (4%) individuals, while nausea was reported by 4 (8%) patients. Dizziness was experienced by 5 (10%) patients, headache by 4 (8%) patients, vomiting by 3 (6%) patients, constipation by 0 (0%) patients, nasal congestion by 3 (6%) patients, and diarrhoea by 1 (2%) patient in Group II. There were no substantial side effects seen in any of the two groups. Kucukpolat S et al. [17] likewise found no difference in adverse effects between mono-and combination treatment.

In summary, our study data showed that the use of combination treatment led to a significant increase in the rate of ejection of ureteric stones. Furthermore, it provides expedited elimination of stones, decreased occurrence of painful episodes, and diminished requirement for pain medication. Both drugs are considered to be safe, effective, and well-tolerated, with low side effects.

CONCLUSION

The application of medical expulsive therapy (MET) alongside conservative approaches has gained popularity in recent years for addressing intermediate and distal ureteric stones. In our research, we evaluated the effectiveness of tamsulosin, both alone and in conjunction with deflazacort, as a medical expulsive treatment aimed at facilitating the clearance of stones located in the middle and lower ureters. Our results indicated that the combination therapy significantly increases the rate of ureteric stone expulsion compared to other methods. Furthermore, it promotes quicker stone removal, reduces the frequency of colic episodes, and diminishes the reliance on pain relief medications. Both tamsulosin and deflazacort are considered safe, effective, and generally well tolerated, with only a few sporadic side effects reported.

FUNDING

Nil

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors have contributed equally

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Declared none

REFERENCES

  1. Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003;228(2):319-29. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2282011726, PMID 12819343.

  2. Sohgaura A, Bigoniya P. A review on epidemiology and etiology of renal stone. Am J Drug Discov Dev. 2017;7(2):54-62. doi: 10.3923/ajdd.2017.54.62.

  3. Jendeberg J, Geijer H, Alshamari M, Cierzniak B, Liden M. Size matters: the width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage. Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4775-85. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6, PMID 28593428.

  4. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG. Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2418-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107.

  5. Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Efficacy of an alpha1 blocker in expulsive therapy of lower ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2008;22(1):41-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0133, PMID 18315472.

  6. Pricop C, Novac C, Negru D, Ilie C, Pricop A, Tanase V. Can selective alpha-blockers help the spontaneous passage of the stones located in the uretero-bladder junction. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2004 Jan-Mar;108(1):128-33.

  7. Coutinho AE, Chapman KE. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids recent developments and mechanistic insights. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;335(1):2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.04.005, PMID 20398732.

  8. Pace KT, Weir MJ, Tariq N, Honey RJ. Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment. J Urol. 2000;164(6):1905-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66914-5, PMID 11061877.

  9. Kim SC, Coe FL, Tinmouth WW, Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Parks JH. Stone formation is proportional to papillary surface coverage by Randall’s plaque. J Urol. 2005;173(1):117-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000147270.68481.ce, PMID 15592050.

  10. Kim SC, Coe FL, Tinmouth WW, Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Parks JH. Stone formation is proportional to papillary surface coverage by Randall’s plaque. J Urol. 2005;173(1):117-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000147270.68481.ce, PMID 15592050.

  11. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC, Urologic Diseases of America Project. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173(3):848-57. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7, PMID 15711292.

  12. Simforoosh N, Aminsharifi A, Tabibi A, Noor Alizadeh A, Zand S, Radfar MH. Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy for managing large staghorn calculi. BJU Int. 2008 May;101(10):1293-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07516.x, PMID 18284405.

  13. Lingeman JE. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Development instrumentation and current status. Urol Clin North Am. 1997 Feb;24(1):185-211. doi: 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70363-3, PMID 9048861.

  14. Matlaga BR, Assimos DG. Changing indications of open stone surgery. Urology. 2002 Apr;59(4):490-3. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01670-3, PMID 11927296.

  15. Park JM. Normal development of the urogenital system Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 3121-48.

  16. Anderson JK, Kabalin JN, Cadeddu JA. Surgical anatomy of retroperitoneum adrenals kidneys and ureters. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed Wein AJ, editor. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 3-37.

  17. Sinha AR, Siwach V. Evaluation of the efficacy of tamsulosin and deflazacort versus tamsulosin alone in expulsion of lower ureteric stones in a tertiary center. Int J Sci Stud. 2019;6(10):68-72.