TO STUDY THE EFFECT OF MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE ON THE URINARY BLADDER

Authors

  • VIJAY K GUJAR Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
  • KARUNA R KACHHAWA Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Rajendra Gode Medical College, Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
  • MOHAN M PETHE Department of Pharmacology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
  • SANKET HIWARE Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-3325
  • ADITYA M TARNEKAR Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
  • SAMEER YELWATKAR Department of Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i5.54229

Keywords:

Aspartame, Swiss Albino mice, Urinary bladder, Histology

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the appropriateness of statistical tests (Z-test, t-test, and Mann–Whitney U test) for small-sample analyses, addressing common misconceptions and providing evidence-based guidelines for test selection in low-data scenarios.

Methods: A comparative framework was developed to assess the performance of parametric and non-parametric tests under varying sample sizes (n<10 to n=30) and distributional assumptions (normal vs. skewed). Normality was tested through Shapiro–Wilk tests, and simulated datasets with controlled variance and outliers were analyzed.

Results: Z-tests produced inflated type I errors for n<30 due to reliance on known population variance, a rarely feasible assumption in small samples. T-tests maintained robustness for n≥15 with normal distributions, whereas Mann–Whitney U tests outperformed parametric alternatives for n<15 or non-normal data (skewness >2).

Conclusion: Researchers should default to t-tests for small samples with approximate normality and use Mann–Whitney U tests for highly skewed data or n<15. Transparent reporting of sample sizes, normality checks, and test rationale is critical to ensure methodological validity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Young DB, McCormick GM 2nd. There’s death in the cup, so beware! Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1995;16(3):223-8. doi: 10.1097/00000433- 199509000-00007. PMID 7495263

Lajtha A, Reilly MA, Dunlop DS. Aspartame consumption: Lack of effects on neural function. J Nutr Biochem. 1994;5(6):266-83. doi: 10.1016/0955-2863(94)90032-9

Parthasarathy NJ, Kumar RS, Manikandan S, Devi RS. Methanol-induced oxidative stress in rat lymphoid organs. J Occup Health. 2006;48(1):20-7. doi: 10.1539/joh.48.20, PMID 16484759

Wurtman RJ. Neurochemical changes following high-dose aspartame with dietary carbohydrates. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(7):429-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198308183090710, PMID 6877300

Kitahori Y, Kitamura M, Konishi N, Matsuda H, Tao M, Matsui E, et al. Carcinogenicity study of monosodium aspartate in Fischer 344 rats: 100 weeks treatment. J Toxicol Pathol. 1996;9(2):161-8. doi: 10.1293/ tox.9.161

Umi BI. The Effect of Aspartame to the Serum Creatinine Level and Histologic Structure of Kidney in Mice. Available from: http://26068. blogspot.com/2007/05/effect aspartame.htm

World Health Organization. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. World Health Organization; 2016.

Mukhopadhyay M, Mukherjee A, Chakrabarti J. In vivo cytogenetic studies on blends of aspartame and acesulfame-K. Food Chem Toxicol. 2000;38(1):75-7. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00115-5, PMID 10685017

Abdollahi M. Mechanism of aspartame induced antinociception in mice. Indian J Pharmacol. 2003;35:37-41.

Martins MR, Azoubel R. Effects of aspartame on fetal kidney: A orphometric and stereological study. Int J Morphol 2007;25:689-94. doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022007000400004

AlSuhaibani ES. In vivo cytogenetic studies on aspartame. Comp Funct Genomics. 2010;2010:605921. doi: 10.1155/2010/605921, PMID 20689731

Iman I. Effect of aspartame on some oxidative stress parameters in liver and kidney of rats. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;5(6):678-862. doi: 10.5897/AJPP10.302

Li H, Liang H, Yang H, Zhang X, Ding X, Zhang R, et al. Association between intake of sweetened beverages with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022;44(3):516-26. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab069, PMID 33837431

Potts WJ. SC -18862: A Sweetening Agent. Pharmacological Studies. WHO Food Additives Series; 1973. p. 15.

Ghanem AM. A review on recent advances in transdermal drug delivery systems of tamsulosin. Int J Appl Pharm. 2024;16(2):28-33. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2024v16i2.49950

Jagadeesh K, Kadiyala KG, Varma Dendukuri BN, Guttula RS, Gupta Tiruveedhi VL, et al. Quality control assessment of dutasteride and silodosin in capsules and tablets employing a novel developed HPLC technique; evaluation of stabilities of dutasteride and silodosin in accelerated degradation. Int J Appl Pharm. 2023;15(6):98-107. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2023v15i6.49036

Published

07-05-2025

How to Cite

VIJAY K GUJAR, et al. “TO STUDY THE EFFECT OF MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE ON THE URINARY BLADDER”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 18, no. 5, May 2025, pp. 146-9, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i5.54229.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)