LYMPH NODE CYTOLOGY REPORTING BY “SYDNEY SYSTEM: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO LYMPH NODE FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i5.54339Keywords:
lymphadenopathies, Sydney method, Fine-needle aspiration, Lymph node cytopathologyAbstract
Objectives: The major goal of the current investigation was to categorize the lesions found in lymph nodes using the Sydney approach for reporting cytopathology of lymph nodes.
Methods: This investigation was carried out retrospectively at Maharshi Vishwamitra autonomous state medical college in Ghazipur, between January 2022 and December 2023. Total 250 patients were examined; cytopathologically assessed, and categorized using the Sydney method. Whenever feasible, a link between histopathology and clinical findings was made.
Results: Out of 250 cases, 04% (n=10) were inadequate/non-diagnostic (L1 category), 87% (n=218) were benign (L2 category), 02% (n=05) were atypical (L3 category), 2.8% (n=2.8%) were suspicious of malignancy (L4 category), and 04% (n=10) were malignant (L5 category). The sensitivity and specificity was 94.4% and 98.1%. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 94.4%, 98.1%, and 97.1%, respectively. For L2 category, the probability of malignancy was 1.9 %, for L3 category 66.6% and for L4 and L5 was 100%.
Conclusion: The suggested reporting system intends to provide consistent recommendations on management regimens, improve communication between cytopathologists and doctors, and standardize reporting.
Downloads
References
Gupta M, Dahiya J, Marwaha RK, Dureja H. Therapies in cancer treatment: An overview. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015 Apr;7(4):1-9.
Zhou J, Li F, Meng L, Hao F, Liu X, Zhao C, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology for lymph nodes: A three-year study. Br J Biomed Sci. 2016;73(1):28-31. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2016.1144947, PMID 27182674
Cibas ES, Ducatman BS. Cytology: Diagnostic Principles and Clinical Correlates. 5th ed. Maryland Heights: Elsevier Incorporated; 2020.
Rammeh S, Romdhane E, Sassi A, Belhajkacem L, Blel A, Ksentini M, et al. Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of head and neck masses. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 May;47(5):394-9. doi: 10.1002/ dc.24120, PMID 30488579
Al-Abbadi MA, Barroca H, Bode-Lesniewska B, Calaminici M, Caraway NP, Chhieng DF, et al. A proposal for the performance, classification, and reporting of lymph node fine-needle aspiration cytopathology: The Sydney system. Acta Cytol. 2020;64(4):306-22. doi: 10.1159/000506497, PMID 32454496
Pandya D, Bhetariya B, Gupta P. Diagnostic utility of proposed Sydney system of lymph node by fine needle aspiration cytology: A cross-sectional Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(12):EC38-41. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57693.17355
Gupta P, Gupta N, Kumar P, Bhardwaj S, Srinivasan R, Dey P, et al. Assessment of risk of malignancy by application of the proposed Sydney system for classification and reporting lymph node cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Sep;129(9):701-18. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22432, PMID 33830657
Vigliar E, Acanfora G, Iaccarino A, Mascolo M, Russo D, Scalia G, et al. A novel approach to classification and reporting of lymph node fine-needle cytology: Application of the proposed Sydney system. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;11(8):1314. doi: 10.3390/ diagnostics11081314, PMID 34441249
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Shivendra Dutt Shukla, Abhishek Singh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.