EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF NOVEL HERBAL TOPICAL ANESTHETIC GEL AND 2% LIGNOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE GEL DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF LOCAL ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN: AN IN VIVO STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i11.54539Keywords:
Topical anesthetics, Intraoral injection, Pain perception, Herbal topical gelAbstract
Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel herbal topical anesthetic gel compared to conventional 2% lignocaine hydrochloride gel during local anesthesia administration in children.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial with 42 children aged 5–14 years was conducted. Participants were divided into two groups (n=21 each): Group A received 2% lignocaine gel, and Group B received herbal gel. Pain response was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), sound eye motor (SEM) scale, and hedonic 9-point scale. An independent t-test was used for intergroup comparison.
Results: The mean VAS scores were 5.67±1.32 for lignocaine and 5.19±0.87 for herbal gel (p=0.175). SEM scores were 3.19±0.75 for lignocaine and 2.95±0.86 for herbal gel (p=0.346), indicating no statistically significant differences in pain perception. However, the hedonic 9-point scale showed significantly higher taste acceptability for the herbal gel (5.86±1.15) compared to lignocaine (3.52±0.98), with a p<0.001.
Conclusion: While both gels demonstrated similar efficacy in pain control, the herbal gel was significantly more palatable, suggesting it may be a more child-friendly alternative in pediatric dentistry.
Downloads
References
1. Havale R, Rao DG, Shrutha SP, Tuppadmath KM, Tharay N, Mathew I, et al. Comparative evaluation of pain perception following topical application of clove oil, betel leaf extract, lignocaine gel, and ice prior to intraoral injection in children aged 6-10 years: A randomized control study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021;21(4):329-36. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.329, PMID 34395900
2. Singh R, Gupta N, Gambhir N. Comparative evaluation of reduction in pain perception using 5% topical LA vs Freezed Cone as a preparatory agent for intraoral injection in children and effect of VRD as distraction technique. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(5):558-63. doi: 10.5005/ jp-journals-10005-2453, PMID 36865722
3. Amruthavarshini I, Vinay C, Uloopi KS, Roja Ramya KS, Chandrasekhar R, Penmatsa C. Effectiveness of pre-cooling the injection site, laser biostimulation, and topical local anesthetic gel in reduction of local anesthesia injection pain in children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(1):81-3. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1913, PMID 34326589
4. Kotian N, Mani G, Ramakrishnan M. Comparative evaluation of two different topical anesthetic agents in controlling pain during intraoral local anesthetic administration in children: A split-mouth triple-blinded randomized clinical trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(2):180-2. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1905, PMID 34413587
5. Lakshmanan L, Ravindran V. Efficacy of cryotherapy application on the pain perception during intraoral injection: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(5):616-20. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2032, PMID 34934271
6. Kalva JJ, Sims CA, Puentes LA, Snyder DJ, Bartoshuk LM. Comparison of the hedonic general labeled magnitude scale with the hedonic 9-point scale. J Food Sci. 2014;79(2):S238-45. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12342, PMID 24422940
7. Ferrazzano GF, Di Fabio G, Gatto R, Caruso S, Botticelli G, Caruso S. Effectiveness and tolerability of a new formulation of a topical anesthetic in reduction of pain and parents’ satisfaction in pediatric dentistry. Children (Basel). 2023;10(3):444. doi: 10.3390/children10030444, PMID 36980002
8. Peng T, Qu S, Du Z, Chen Z, Xiao T, Chen R. A systematic review of the measurement properties of face, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale for pediatric pain assessment. J Pain Res. 2023;16:1185-96. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S397064, PMID 37064956
9. Abdallah M, Neseem DI, Elgazayerly ON, Abdelbary AA. Topical delivery of quercetin loaded transfersomes for wound treatment: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J App Pharm. 2021:189-97. doi: 10.22159/ ijap.2021v13i5.41345
10. Anantharaj A, Sabu JM, Ramakrishna S, Jagdeesh RB, Praveen P, Shankarappa PR. A comparative evaluation of pain perception following topical application of benzocaine gel, clove-papaya based anesthetic gel and precooling of the injection site before intraoral injections in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020;38(2):184-9. doi: 10.4103/ jisppd.jisppd_153_18, PMID 32611866
11. Tandon S, Kalia G, Sharma M, Mathur R, Rathore K, Gandhi M. Comparative evaluation of mucosal vibrator with topical anesthetic gel to reduce pain during administration of local anesthesia in pediatric patients: An in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11(4):261-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1523, PMID 30397367
12. O’Brien L, Taddio A, Lyszkiewicz DA, Koren G. A critical review of the topical local anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain. Paediatr Drugs. 2005;7(1):41-54. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200507010- 00004, PMID 15777110
13. Shah V, Taddio A, Rieder MJ, HELPinKIDS Team. Effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Ther. 2009;(31 Suppl 2):S104-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.001, PMID 19781433
14. Ferrazzano GF, Di Fabio G, Caruso S, Gatto R, Goyal V, Caruso S. Clinical efficacy and tolerability of a new experimental mucoadhesive patch for topical anesthesia of oral mucosa in pediatric dentistry. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061558, PMID 38541784
15. Daneshkazemi A, Abrisham SM, Daneshkazemi P, Davoudi A. The efficacy of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics as a topical anesthetic agent used for dental procedures: A brief review. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10(3):383-7. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.172342, PMID 27746520
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Ishani Rahate, Punit Fulzele, Nilima Thosar, Anjori Raut, Rijuta Gujar, Shepali Hule

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.