CORRELATION OF PLACENTAL THICKNESS WITH GESTATIONAL AGE IN SECOND AND THIRD TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY USING ULTRASONOGRAPHY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i10.56238Keywords:
Placental Thickness, Gestational age, Ultrasonography, Second trimester,, Third trimesterAbstract
Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate correlation between ultrasound-measured placental thickness and gestational age in singleton pregnancies beyond 12 weeks’ gestation.
Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center over 2 years, involving 120 pregnant women beyond 12 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancies. Gestational age was first assessed using standard fetal biometric parameters. Placental thickness was measured at the level of the umbilical cord insertion using grayscale ultrasound. It was measured perpendicular to the chorionic and basal plates. Placental location and abnormalities were also recorded. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 23.0. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between placental thickness and gestational age. For statistical purposes, a p<0.05 is considered as statistically significant.
Results: Most placentas were anteriorly located (46.67%), and the majority had normal morphology (84.17%). There was a strong and statistically significant positive correlation between placental thickness and gestational age from 12 to 37 weeks of gestation in singleton pregnancies. In the 12–24 week group (n=58), r=0.9623 (p<0.0001), and in the 25–37 week group (n=59), r=0.9892 (p<0.00001). Beyond 38 weeks (n=3), placental thickness showed a slight decline, and the correlation was negative (r=−0.7384, p=0.083). However, this correlation was not found to be statistically significant.
Conclusion: Placental thickness correlated positively with gestational age from 12 to 37 weeks. Its utility as a marker for gestational age estimation diminishes beyond 38 weeks. Therefore, placental thickness can be used as reliable adjunct to fetal biometry for GA estimation during the second and third trimesters.
Downloads
References
1. Kadam D, Patil S, Jain M. Placental thickness: An important parameter in determining gestational age and fetal growth during ANC scan. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(11):4619-22.
2. Banik S, Rajkumari A, Devi AJ, Sarkar R, Ayekpam M. Placental thickness measurement by ultrasonography and its correlation with gestational age of fetus in the Manipuri population. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;12(2):117-22. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_658_21
3. Burton GJ, Fowden AL. The placenta: A multifaceted, transient organ. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 5;370(1663):20140066. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0066
4. Kaushal L, Patil A, Kocherla K. Evaluation of placental thickness as a sonological indicator for estimation of gestational age of foetus in normal singleton pregnancy. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;3(5):1213-8.
5. Sharami SH, Milani F, Fallah Arzpeyma S, Dalil Heirati SF, Pourhabibi Z. The relationship between placental thickness and gestational age in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 27;6(5):e1228. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1228
6. Hata T, Tanaka H, Noguchi J, Hata K. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of the placenta. Placenta. 2011 Feb;32(2):105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.11.001
7. Nagpal K, Mittal P, Grover SB. Role of ultrasonographic placental thickness in prediction of fetal outcome: A prospective Indian study. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Oct;68(5):349-54. doi: 10.1007/s13224- 017-1038-8
8. Azagidi AS, Ibitoye BO, Makinde ON, Idowu BM, Aderibigbe AS. Fetal gestational age determination using ultrasound placental thickness. J Med Ultrasound. 2019 Oct 9;28(1):17-23. doi: 10.4103/ JMU.JMU_127_18
9. Rutherford JN, deMartelly VA, Ragsdale HB, Avila JL, Lee NR, Kuzawa CW. Global population variation in placental size and structure: Evidence from Cebu, Philippines. Placenta. 2019 Sep 15;85:40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2019.08.076
10. Sun X, Shen J, Wang L. Insights into the role of placenta thickness as a predictive marker of perinatal outcome. J Int Med Res. 2021 Feb;49(2):300060521990969. doi: 10.1177/0300060521990969
11. Afrakhteh M, Moeini A, Sanei Taheri M, Haghighatkhah HR. Correlation between placental thickness in the second and third trimester and fetal weight. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013;35(7):317- 22.
12. Rawal S, Ray S, Sharma N. Correlation between ultrasonographic placental thickness and adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes. Cureus2024 Mar 18;16(3):e56410. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56410
13. Vinchurkar KN, Aiyappan SK, Prem Kumar C, Shanmugam V, Singh A. Correlation of placental thickness with gestational age in second and third trimester using ultrasonography. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2023;54:164. doi: 10.1186/s43055-023-01112-y
14. Karthikeyan T, Subramaniam RK, Johnson W, Prabhu K. Placental thickness & its correlation to gestational age & foetal growth parameters- a cross sectional ultrasonographic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012 Dec;6(10):1732-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4867.2652
15. Pant S, Dashottar S. A correlative study to evaluate the gestational age by sonological measurement of placental thickness in normal second and third trimester of pregnancy. Int J Adv Med. 2017;4(6):1638-44.
16. Mathai BM, Singla SC, Nittala PP, Chakravarti RJ, Toppo JN. Placental thickness: Its correlation with ultrasonographic gestational age in normal and intrauterine growth-retarded pregnancies in the late second and third trimester. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013 Aug;63(4):230-3. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0316-8
17. Humadi EH, Zghair MA, Kudhire NA. The accuracy of placental thickness in estimation of gestational age during late third trimester - A single centre cross sectional study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Dec;71(Suppl 8)(12):S93-6.
18. Omer Ahmed FA, Ibrahim RM, Farouk AM, Aboushady RM. Assessment of placental thickness as a predictor of gestational age and fetal weight in second and third trimester of pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2023;12:794-800.
19. Khajjayam A, Sharma J, Kumar A, Patel A, Malik R. Ultrasound evaluation of placental thickness: Insights from an observational study and implications for fetal growth assessment. Cureus. 2024 Jun 20;16(6):e62760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62760
20. Shinde GR, Kshirsagar N, Laddad M, Shivade V. Ultrasonographic placental thickness versus fetal outcome: A prospective study in Southern India. Caspian J Intern Med. 2021 Fall;12(4):562-7. doi: 10.22088/cjim.12.4.562
21. Rafique Z, Awan MW, Iqbal S, Usmani NN, Ahmad M, Amjad M, Ullah S, et al. The ability of ultrasound sonography (USG) to detect intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in the third trimester of pregnancy with the gold standard of IUGR (parameters by USG Hadlock) as a diagnostic criterion. Cureus. 2021 Dec 19;13(12):e20523. doi: 10.7759/ cureus.20523
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 NELSON NAMEIRAKPAM, GAUTHAM MUTHU, ARUN BABU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
