HARMONIZING THE TAPESTRY OF BREAST LESIONS IN WOMEN: AN INTEGRATED EXPLORATION OF CLINICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, CYTOLOGICAL, HISTOPATHOLOGICAL, AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL PATTERNS

Authors

  • SANGEETHA NAGALINGAM Department of Pathology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • BALAJI VENKATARAMAN Department of Surgery, Chengalpattu Medical College and Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • SWETHA MURALIDHARAN Department of Pathology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i12.57255

Keywords:

Breast lump, Breast imaging reporting and data system, Fine-needle aspiration cytology, Histopathology,, Triple test, Diagnostic validity.

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic validity of clinical examination, radiological imaging, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS), and cytological examination in women presenting with breast lumps, using histopathology as the gold standard.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 96 women with palpable breast lumps at a tertiary teaching hospital over a 2-year period. Each patient underwent clinical examination, mammography (BIRADS scoring), and fine-needle aspiration cytology. The triple test scores were analyzed for diagnostic concordance, and histopathological examination was performed in all cases. Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Among 96 participants, 61 (63.5%) had benign and 35 (36.5%) had malignant lesions confirmed histopathologically. Clinical diagnosis showed the highest sensitivity (93.5%; 95% CI: 78.6–98.2), cytology showed perfect specificity (100%; 95% CI: 94.1–100), and radiology demonstrated moderate sensitivity (77.4%; 95% CI: 59.2–88.7) and specificity (96.9%; 95% CI: 88.2–99.5). The triple test achieved an overall concordance rate of 83.3%. PPV and NPV for clinical, radiological, and cytological evaluations were 93.5%, 77.4%, 100%, and 96.9%, 96.9%, 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: The triple assessment method provides a highly accurate, non-invasive, and cost-effective diagnostic approach for breast lumps. Clinical examination and cytology together offer optimal diagnostic reliability. Integrating histopathology and immunohistochemistry enhances diagnostic precision and guides treatment, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Baron RH, Walsh A. 9 facts everyone should know about breast cancer. Am J Nurs. 1995;95(7):29-33.

2. Ajitha MB, Srinivasan N, Shivaswamy BS, Abhishek V. A systematic study on fibroadenoma of the breast. Int J Biol Adv Res. 2012;3(12):302-7.

3. Rangabashyam N, Gnanaprakasam D, Krishnaraj B, Manohar V, Vijayalakshmi SR. Spectrum of benign breast lesions in Madras. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1983;28(6):369-73.

4. Na SP, Houserková D. Role of various modalities in breast imaging. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2007;151(2):209-18.

5. Morris KT, Pommier RF, Morris A, Schmidt WA, Beagle G, Alexander PW, et al. Usefulness of the triple test score for palpable breast masses. Arch Surg. 2001;136(9):1008-13.

6. Agarwal NK, Choudhury DN, Minocha A. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology, Triple test and tru-cut biopsy in the detection of breast lesion. Asian Pac J Cancer Care. 2023;8(1):34-42.

7. Sharma SK, Singh S, Kumar S. Role of clinical examination in the evaluation of patients with breast lumps: A cytopathological study. World Acad Sci J. 2024;6(3):152-60.

8. Apuroopa M, Chakravarthy VK, Rao DR. Application of Yokohama system for reporting breast fine needle aspiration cytology in correlation with histopathological and radiological findings. Ann Pathol Lab Med. 2020;7:A210-5.

9. Sankaye SB, Dongre SD. Cytological study of palpable breast lumps presenting in an Indian rural setup. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014;35:159-64.

10. Gana SG, Olarinoye- Akorede SA, Samaila MO, Yusufu lM. Modified triple assessment in palpable breast lumps: A prospective study. Eur Soc Med J. 2025;7(2):142-50.

11. Jagadev S, Kustagi SS, Balaji C, Reddy KS, Bhaarat BN. Assessing the efficacy of the modified triple test in the diagnosis of palpable breast lumps. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2024;6(1):215-9.

12. Ogbuanya, AUO, Anyanwu SN, Iyare EF, Nwigwe CG. The role of fine needle aspiration cytology in triple assessment of patients with malignant breast lumps. Niger J Surg. 2021;26(1):35-41.

13. El-Bolkainy TM, Shabaan HA, Abodeif WT, El-Bolkainy MN, El-Tony A. Intra-operative diagnosis of breast mass-lesions: Comparison of the validity of touch smear preparation and frozen section techniques. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2008 Mar;20(1):63-9. PMID 19847283

14. Sharma SK, Singh S and Kumar S. Role of clinical examination in the evaluation of patients with breast lumps: A cytopathological study. World Acad Sci J. 2024;6:33.

Published

07-12-2025

How to Cite

SANGEETHA NAGALINGAM, et al. “HARMONIZING THE TAPESTRY OF BREAST LESIONS IN WOMEN: AN INTEGRATED EXPLORATION OF CLINICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, CYTOLOGICAL, HISTOPATHOLOGICAL, AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL PATTERNS”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 18, no. 12, Dec. 2025, pp. 167-71, doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2025v18i12.57255.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)