INTEGRATING GREEN CHEMISTRY AND QUALITY BY DESIGN: DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL STARCH-BASED MICROCOMPOSITE SYSTEM FOR PROLONGED CAPTOPRIL DELIVERY AND FLATTENED PHARMACOKINETICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2026v19i4.58187Keywords:
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius, Carboxymethyl starch, Deep eutectic solvent, Quality by Design, Sustained release, Microcomposite beads, Captopril, PharmacokineticsAbstract
Objectives: The goal of this work was to form a new once-a-day oral dosage form (microcomposite beads) for the blood pressure drug Captopril that releases the medicine slowly, and that is built from a starch taken from plants by a low-impact “green” method.
Methods: Tubers of Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Elephant Foot Yam) were the starting material. A deep eutectic solvent made from glycerol and choline chloride pulled the native starch, which was then carboxymethylated to produce Carboxymethylated Elephant Foot Yam Starch (CM-EFYS) with 0.45±0.03 carboxymethyl groups per glucose unit. Fourier-transform infrared spectra showed new carboxylate bands, X-ray data showed a 46.7% drop in crystallinity, while swelling power rose by 77% and solubility by 133%. A quality-by-design approach with a full factorial design-of-experiments matrix was used to prepare drug-loaded beads by combining CM-EFYS with sodium alginate and cross-linking in calcium chloride.
Results: The optimized formulation contained 3.2% w/v CM-EFYS, 3.1% w/v CaCl₂, and a polymer-to-drug ratio of 3.3:1, producing nearly spherical beads of 642±14 μm with 86.9±1.6% drug entrapment. The beads released Captopril gradually for 24 h and followed the Korsmeyer–Peppas model (R2=0.992, n = 0.689). In rabbits, the beads reduced the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by 62.2%, delayed time to Cmax (Tmax) from 2 h to 8 h, and increased mean residence time by 162.6%, while maintaining bioequivalent area under the curve. Six-month stability testing at 40°C and 75% relative humidity showed minimal potency loss when packed in foil.
Conclusion: A functional polymer for once-daily sustained release of captopril was successfully created from green-extracted, CM-EFYS. The optimized formulation demonstrated high drug entrapment efficiency (86.9±1.6%) and controlled 24-h release following Korsmeyer–Peppas kinetics (R²=0.992, n=0.689). The formulation’s stability under accelerated conditions demonstrated its potential as an efficient and environmentally friendly sustained-release oral dosage system.
Downloads
References
1. Adeleke OA. Oral sustained-release drug delivery systems: Design, evaluation and applications. J Control Release. 2021;329:907-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.027
2. Burnier M, Egan BM, Zhang Y. Improving medication adherence in hypertension: The role of single-pill combinations and fixed-dose combinations. Hypertension. 2021;78(4):940-50. doi: 10.1161/ HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17269
3. Constable DJ, Dunn PJ, Hayler JD, Humphrey GR, Leazer JL Jr., Linderman RJ. Key green chemistry research areas-a perspective from pharmaceutical manufacturers. Green Chem. 2007;9(5):411-20. doi: 10.1039/B703488C
4. Duchin KL, McKinstry DN, Cohen AI, Migdalof BH. Pharmacokinetics of captopril in healthy subjects and in patients withcardiovascular diseases. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1988;14(4):241-59. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198814040-00002, PMID 3292102
5. Goh CH, Heng PW, Chan LW. Alginates as a useful natural polymer for microencapsulation and therapeutic applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.012
6. ICH. ICH Q8 (R2) pharmaceutical development. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human use. India: ICH; 2009.
7. Holler JG, Renmælmo B, Fjellaksel R. Stability evaluation of [18F] FDG: Literature study, stability studies from two different PET centres and future recommendations. EJNMMI Radiopharmacy Chem. 2022;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41181-022-00154-3, PMID 35201511
8. Kaur B, Ariffin F, Bhat R, Karim AA. Progress in starch modification in the last decade. Food Hydrocoll. 2012;26(2):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j. foodhyd.2011.02.016
9. Kaur J, Kaur G, Sharma S. Starch: A potential biomaterial for controlled release drug delivery systems. Crit Rev. 2016;33(6):503-30. doi: 10.1615/2016017163
10. Narkhede Sachin B, Bendale AR, Jadhav AG, Patel K, Vidyasagar G. Isolation and evaluation of starch of Artocarpus heterophyllus as a tablet binder. Int J PharmTech Res. 2011;3:836-40.
11. Rathod JG, Dhole SN, Kulkarni NS. Modified release multi-unit system: A review. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2025;17(6):1-8. doi: 10.22159/ ijcpr.2025v17i6.7062
12. Liu Z, Jiao Y, Wang Y, Zhou C, Zhang Z. Polysaccharides-based nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(15):1650-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.001, PMID 18848591
13. Masina N, Choonara YE, Kumar P, Du Toit LC, Govender M, Indermun S. A review of the chemical modification techniques of starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157:1226-36. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.094, PMID 27987827
14. McFadyen RJ, Elliott HL, Meredith PA. The clinical pharmacology of ACE inhibitors. Drug Saf. 1999;21(4):273-85. doi: 10.2165/00002018- 199921040-00003
15. Mishra S, Rai T, Singh S. Physicochemical and functional properties of Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Elephant Foot Yam) starch. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;138:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.225
16. Fegade TD, Patil VR, Deshmukh TA. Evaluation of Vateria indica modified gum as a release retardant matrix in the tablet dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023;15(4):28-32. doi: 10.22159/ ijpps.2023v15i4.47329
17. Nataraj D, Reddy N. Chemical modifications of alginate and its derivatives. Int J Chem Res. 2020;4(1):1-17. doi: 10.22159/ ijcr.2020v4i1.98
18. Shah RB, Tawakkul MA, Khan MA. Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(1):250-8. doi: 10.1208/s12249-008-9046-8
19. Pambani R, Adam AB, Oluwadolapo Joy E, Bioltif YE, Abubakar MY. Catalytic system for efficient biodegradable polymer synthesis: A review. Int J Chem Res. 2025;9(4):17-25. doi: 10.22159/ ijcr.2025v9i4.286
20. Singhvi G, Singh M. In-vitro drug release characterization models. Int J Pharm Stud Res. 2011;2(1):77-84.
21. Tijsen CJ, Scherpenkate HJ, Stamhuis EJ, Beenackers AA. Optimisation of the process conditions for the modification of starch. Chem Eng Sci. 2001;56(2):453-8. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00245-8
22. Verma S, Lan Y, Gokhale R, Burgess DJ. Quality by design: An overview of the basic concepts. J Validation Technol. 2009;15(1):10-9.
23. Yu LX, Amidon G, Khan MA, Hoag SW, Polli J, Raju GK. Understanding pharmaceutical quality by design. AAPS J. 2014;16(4):771-83. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9598-3, PMID 24854893
24. Zdanowicz M, Wilpiszewska K, Spychaj T. Deep eutectic solvents for polysaccharides processing. A review. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;200: 361-80. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.078, PMID 30177177
25. Zhang L, Mäder K. Starch-based microspheres: Properties and applications in drug delivery. Adv Mater Res. 2011;295-297:1327-30. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.295-297.1327
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Dinesh Bawankar, Ujwalkumar B. Vyas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The publication is licensed under CC By and is open access. Copyright is with author and allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions.