PSYCHOLOGICAL DRIVERS OF ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY: INTEGRATING GREEN FINANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Authors

  • DURGESHWARY KOLHE School of Vedic Sciences, MIT -ADT University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • ARSHAD BHAT Amity Institute of Liberal Arts, Amity University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2026v14i2.57755

Keywords:

Economic sustainability, Green finance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Behavioural economics, Consumer behaviour

Abstract

Economic sustainability has emerged as a critical objective in the global effort to combat environmental degradation and promote long-term prosperity. This review article explores the psychological drivers that underpin economic sustainability, focusing on the integration of green finance and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Drawing from a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, the paper identifies key psychological factors that influence the adoption and effectiveness of sustainable economic practices. These factors include individual and organizational values, attitudes toward environmental and social issues, and the role of leadership in fostering a culture of sustainability. The article examines how green finance, as an innovative financial approach, leverages these psychological drivers to channel investments toward environmentally friendly projects. Concurrently, the integration of CSR initiatives is analyzed as a strategic method for businesses to align their operations with broader societal goals, thereby enhancing their legitimacy and competitive advantage. By elucidating the interplay between psychological drivers and sustainable economic practices, this review underscores the importance of a holistic approach in promoting economic sustainability. It advocates for policies and strategies that harness psychological insights to bolster the efficacy of green finance and CSR, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable and equitable global economy.

References

Amodeo, R.A. (2015). Becoming Sustainable: Identity Dynamics within Transformational Culture Change at Interface, Inc. [Doctoral Dissertation, Benedictine University].

Andersson, J.J. (2019). Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1-30.

Bauer, R., & Hann, D. (2010). Corporate environmental management and credit risk. Available from: https://ssrn/1660470 [Last accessed on 2026 Feb 10].

Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 462-468.

Carroll, A.B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87-96.

Chouinard, Y., & Stanley, V. (2012). The responsible company: What we’ve learned from Patagonia’s first 40 years. Ventura: Patagonia Books.

Cialdini, R.B., & Goldstein, N.J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.

Climate Bonds Initiative. (2021). 2020 green bond market summary. United Kingdom: Climate Bonds Initiative.

Climate Bonds Initiative. (2021). Record $269.5bn green issuance for 2020: Late surge sees pandemic year pip 2019 total by $3bn. United Kingdom: Climate Bonds Initiative.

Costanza, R., & Daly, H.E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37-46.

Daly, H.E. (1990). Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2(1), 1-6.

Døskeland, T., & Pedersen, L.J.T. (2016). Investing with brain or heart? A field experiment on responsible investment. Management Science, 62(6), 1632-1644.

Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60, 2835-2857.

Eccles, R.G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st Century business. Canada: New Society Publishers.

Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51.

European Commission. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. Belgium: European Commission.

European Commission. (2021). Overview of Sustainable Finance. Belgium: European Commission.

Finnish National Agency for Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Finland: Finnish National Agency for Education.

Gates Foundation. (2019). Annual report 2019. Seattle: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157.

Glavas, A., & Piderit, S.K. (2009). How does doing good matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on employees. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 36, 51-70.

Goldstein, N.J., Cialdini, R.B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482.

Green Climate Fund. (2021). Portfolio dashboard. Songdo: Green Climate Fund.

Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. Seattle: WH Allen.

Henderson, R. (2015). Making the Business Case for Environmental Sustainability. Harvard Business School Working Paper, no. 15-068.

Henze, V. (2021). Sustainable debt breaks annual record despite COVID-19 challenges. London: BloombergNEF.

Interface. (2019). Global sustainability report 2019. United States: Interface.

International Capital Market Association (ICMA). (2021). Green bond principles. Switzerland: International Capital Market Association.

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Spain: Earthscan.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.

Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L.T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067-1111.

Lawn, P.A. (2003). Atheoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), genuine progress indicator (GPI), and other related indexes. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 105-118.

Linnenluecke, M.K., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357-366.

Lowitt, E. (2011). The future of value: How sustainability creates value through competitive differentiation. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.

Marquis, C., & Kanter, R.M. (2010). IBM: The corporate service corps (pp. 409-106). Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Case.

Merritt, A.C., Effron, D.A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344-357.

Nielsen. (2015). The sustainability imperative: New insights on consumer expectations. In Global Sustainability Report.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.

Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

Rupp, D.E., Shao, R., Thornton, M.A., & Skarlicki, D.P. (2013). Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first‐party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 895-933.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Scholtens, B. (2017). Why finance should care about ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(7), 500-505.

Soundarrajan, P., & Vivek, N. (2016). Green finance for sustainable green economic growth in India. Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 35-44.

Stern, P.C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.

Unilever. (2020). Unilever sustainable living plan: 10 years on. United Kingdom: Unilever.

Waldman, D.A., Siegel, D.S., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703-1725.

Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business and Society, 55(8), 1083-1121.

Zadek, S., & Zhang, C. (2014). Greening China’s financial system: An initial exploration. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Published

01-03-2026

How to Cite

DURGESHWARY KOLHE, & ARSHAD BHAT. (2026). PSYCHOLOGICAL DRIVERS OF ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY: INTEGRATING GREEN FINANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. Innovare Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2026v14i2.57755

Issue

Section

Review Article(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.