SMART BIOSURFACTANT NANOCARRIERS: ROS-LABILE ORAL DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED CELECOXIB EFFICACY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Authors

  • T. PRADEEPA Faculty of Pharmacy, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3840-6158
  • RAJAGANAPATHY KALIYAPERUMAL Faculty of Pharmacy, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7788-4623

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2026v18i2.57021

Keywords:

Rheumatoid arthritis, Celecoxib, Nanostructured lipid carriers, Sophorolipid, ROS-responsive delivery, Anti-inflammatory therapy

Abstract

Objective: The chronic autoimmune illness known as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is typified by joint destruction, oxidative stress, and ongoing inflammation. The selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib is useful in the treatment of RA, although its lack of disease-specific targeting, low oral bioavailability, and poor solubility restrict its effectiveness. In order to increase absorption, offer inflammation-triggered release, and boost treatment effectiveness in RA, this study set out to create a sophorolipid-stabilized, ROS-labile nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) system for oral celecoxib administration.

Methods: Using microfluidic ethanol injection, NLCs were created with thioketal (TK)-PEG-cholesterol integrated at the interface and sophorolipid acting as a biosurfactant. Mucus penetration, epithelial transport, hemocompatibility, ROS-triggered release, and in vitro pharmacological activity in LPS-stimulated macrophages were all assessed, along with the formulation's physicochemical and interfacial characteristics.

Results: Optimized NLCs displayed a size of 138±6 nm, PDI<0.2, zeta potential −21 mV, and encapsulation efficiency>90%. Under ROS exposure, drug release reached ~83% at 12 h versus ~21% in controls. SL-NLCs showed 3-fold higher mucus diffusivity and significantly improved Caco-2 permeability (P_app 5.7×10⁻⁶ cm/s). In vitro studies demonstrated superior cytokine suppression (TNF-α ↓68%, IL-6 ↓62%) and COX-2 downregulation. Hemolysis was<3%, indicating excellent biocompatibility.

Conclusion: With improved absorption, inflammation-specific release, and strong anti-inflammatory action, ROS-labile, sophorolipid-stabilized NLCs offer a secure and efficient oral delivery system for celecoxib that may find therapeutic use in RA.

References

1. Kondo N, Kanai T, Okada M. Rheumatoid arthritis and reactive oxygen species: a review. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023;45(4):3000-15. doi: 10.3390/cimb45040197, PMID 37185721.

2. Wang X, Fan D, Cao X, Ye Q, Wang Q, Zhang M. The role of reactive oxygen species in the rheumatoid arthritis-associated synovial microenvironment. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(6):1153. doi: 10.3390/antiox11061153, PMID 35740050.

3. Nath A, Bhattacharjee R, Nandi A, Sinha A, Kar S, Manoharan N. Phage delivered CRISPR-Cas system to combat multidrug-resistant pathogens in gut microbiome. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;151:113122. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113122, PMID 35594718.

4. Meszaros JP, Kandioller W, Spengler G, Prado Roller A, Keppler BK, Enyedy EA. Half-sandwich rhodium complexes with releasable N-donor monodentate ligands: solution chemical properties and the possibility for acidosis activation. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):356. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020356, PMID 36839678.

5. Oliveira Santos MJ, Teles Souza J, De Araujo Calumby RF, Copeland RL, Marcelino HR, Vilas Boas DS. Advances, limitations and perspectives in the use of celecoxib-loaded nanocarriers in therapeutics of cancer. Discov Nano. 2024;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s11671-024-04070-0, PMID 39240502.

6. Liu Y, Yang G, Hui Y, Ranaweera S, Zhao CX. Microfluidic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Small. 2022;18(36):e2106580. doi: 10.1002/smll.202106580, PMID 35396770.

7. Frankiewicz M, Sznitowska M. Design of experiments as a tool to optimize the process of coating minitablets with commercial gastro-resistant coating mixtures. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(9):1816. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091816, PMID 36145563.

8. Pal S, Chatterjee N, Das AK, McClements DJ, Dhar P. Sophorolipids: a comprehensive review on properties and applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;313:102856. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2023.102856, PMID 36827914.

9. Ceresa C, Fracchia L, Sansotera AC, De Rienzo MA, Banat IM. Harnessing the potential of biosurfactants for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(8):2156. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15082156, PMID 37631370.

10. Adu SA, Twigg MS, Naughton PJ, Marchant R, Banat IM. Purified acidic sophorolipid biosurfactants in skincare applications: an assessment of cytotoxic effects in comparison with synthetic surfactants using a 3D in vitro human skin model. Fermentation. 2023;9(11):985. doi: 10.3390/fermentation9110985.

11. Lin WK, Lin SJ, Lee WR, Lin CC, Lin WC, Chang HC. Effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants and biological therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria: a network meta-analysis. Biomedicines. 2022;10(9):2152. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092152, PMID 36140253.

12. Dai G, Chu JC, Chan CK, Choi CH, Ng DK. Reactive oxygen species-responsive polydopamine nanoparticles for targeted and synergistic chemo and photodynamic anticancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2021;13(37):15899-915. doi: 10.1039/D1NR04278E, PMID 34522935.

13. Xue M, Ma P, Zhang L. Reactive oxygen species-cleavable prodrugs in nanomedicine. Acta Pharmacol Sin B. 2023;13(5):2134-54. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.12.025.

14. Zhou Y, Wang D, Gao J. Celecoxib delivery systems for inflammatory diseases. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2024;85:105698. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105698.

15. Xu S, Zhao X, Chen Y. Celecoxib nanomedicines in oncology and inflammation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2024;206:115389. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.115389.

16. Ammar HO, Ghorab MM, Zaki NM. Nanostructured lipid carriers for improved oral celecoxib delivery. Pharm Dev Technol. 2020;25(2):220-30. doi: 10.1080/10837450.2019.1704463.

17. Shi X, Zhang X, Zhang X, Guo H, Wang S. The integration of reactive oxygen species generation and prodrug activation for cancer therapy. BIOI. 2021;3(1):32-40. doi: 10.15212/bioi-2021-0011.

18. Pan X, Li Z, Wang D. Dynamic pendant-drop pitfalls in interfacial science. Langmuir. 2022;38(49):15068-83. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01193.

19. Zhang Q, Huang R, Zhang Z, Shi Z, Sun J, Gao F. Engineering acid-promoted two-photon ratiometric nanoprobes for evaluating HClO in lysosomes and inflammatory bowel disease. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(3):4626-36. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c18731, PMID 39797821.

20. Palos Pinto A, Cordero ML, Dominguez A. Sophorolipids in drug and vaccine delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2023;223:113093. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113093.

21. Xue Y, Wang Q, Zhang G. Biosurfactant-stabilized lipid nanoparticles. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2022;17(14):867-84. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2022-0044.

22. Wang X, An J, Cao T, Guo M, Han F. Application of biosurfactants in medical sciences. Molecules. 2024;29(11):2606. doi: 10.3390/molecules29112606, PMID 38893481.

23. Kisicek T, Renic T, Hafner I, Stepinac M. Simplified rules for serviceability control of FRPRC elements. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(12):2513. doi: 10.3390/polym14122513, PMID 35746089.

24. Lim J, Jung J, Rho J, Kim JB. Cooling performance prediction of particle-based radiative cooling film considering particle size distribution. Micromachines (Basel). 2024;15(3):292. doi: 10.3390/mi15030292, PMID 38542539.

25. Liu C, Zhang W, Li J. Engineering nanoparticles to overcome the mucus barrier. Mater Today Adv. 2021;11:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100138.

26. Ramirez A, Weigandt KM, Hanes J. Multiple particle tracking to probe mucus rheology. Biophys J. 2022;121(9):1713-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.03.011.

27. Shepherd SJ, Issadore D, Mitchell MJ. Microfluidic formulation of nanoparticles for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2021;332:12-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.022.

28. Cheng Y, Hay CD, Mahuttanatan SM, Hindley JW, Ces O, Elani Y. Microfluidic technologies for lipid vesicle generation. Lab Chip. 2024;24(20):4679-716. doi: 10.1039/D4LC00380B, PMID 39323383.

29. Septiadi WN, Alim M, Adi MN, Rizkiantoro C, Ramadhani D, Marianti KM. A performance investigation of the portable face mask sterilization device based on the heat pipe and thermoelectric. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2024;2891(1):080013-9. doi: 10.1063/5.0202217.

30. Trejo Solis C, Escamilla Ramirez A, Jimenez Farfan D, Castillo Rodriguez RA, Flores Najera A, Cruz Salgado A. Crosstalk of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the induction of apoptosis on cancer cells. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(9):871. doi: 10.3390/ph14090871, PMID 34577571.

31. Talarico L, Pepi S, Susino S, Leone G, Bonechi C, Consumi M. Design and optimization of solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with triamcinolone acetonide. Molecules. 2023;28(15):5747. doi: 10.3390/molecules28155747, PMID 37570717.

32. Somadasan S, Subramaniyan G, Athisayaraj MS, Sukumaran SK. Central composite design: an optimization tool for developing pharmaceutical formulations. J Young Pharm. 2024;16(3):400-9. doi: 10.5530/jyp.2024.16.52.

33. Pan Z, Chen X, Zhang J. Interfacial property determination by pendant-drop method. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;69:101843. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2024.101843.

34. Xu L, Xu Z, Wang L. Interfacial rheology of modified silica nanoparticles. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024;14(10):2054. doi: 10.3390/nano14102054.

35. Risse K, Yang J, De Groot A, Gimenez Ribes G, Shen P, Drusch S, Hinderink EBA, Sagis LMC. Advances in large amplitude oscillatory dilatational surface rheology a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;345:103625. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2025.103625.

36. Zhang H, Xu Q, Gong W, Liu S, Luo J, Priestley RD. Interfacial wetting-induced nanorheology of thin polymer films. Phys Rev Research. 2025;7(2):023226. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023226.

37. Jiang X, Zhou JW, Liu H, Chen YX, Lu CZ. Lotus pollen-templated synthesis of C, N, P-self-doped KTi2(PO4)3/TiO2 for sodium ion battery. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022;650:129605. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129605.

38. Zhang Y, Song T, Feng T, Wan Y, Blum NT, Liu C. Plasmonic modulation of gold nanotheranostics for targeted NIR-II photothermal-augmented immunotherapy. Nano Today. 2020;35:100987. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100987.

39. Boyles M, Murphy F, Mueller W, Wohlleben W, Jacobsen NR, Braakhuis H. Development of a standard operating procedure for the DCFH2-DA acellular assessment of reactive oxygen species produced by nanomaterials. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2022;32(6):439-52. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2022.2029656, PMID 35086424.

40. Sedaghat MH, Behnia M, Abouali O. Nanoparticle diffusion in respiratory mucus influenced by mucociliary clearance: a review of mathematical modeling. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2023;36(3):127-43. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2022.0049, PMID 37184652.

41. Guo Y, Ma Y, Chen X, Li M, Ma X, Cheng G. Mucus penetration of surface-engineered nanoparticles in various pH microenvironments. ACS Nano. 2023;17(3):2813-28. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c11147, PMID 36719858.

42. Tjakra M. Optimized artificial colonic mucus model. Mol Pharm. 2024;21(7):1724-35. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c00298.

43. Kus M, Ibragimow I, Piotrowska Kempisty H. Caco-2 cell line standardization with pharmaceutical requirements and in vitro model suitability for permeability assays. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(11):2523. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112523, PMID 38004503.

44. Pires CL, Praca C, Martins PA, Batista De Carvalho AL, Ferreira L, Marques MP. Re-use of Caco-2 monolayers in permeability assays-validation regarding cell monolayer integrity. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(10):1563. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101563, PMID 34683857.

45. Sciurti E, Blasi L, Prontera CT, Barca A, Giampetruzzi L, Verri T. Teer and ion-selective transwell-integrated sensors system for Caco-2 cell model. Micromachines (Basel). 2023;14(3):496. doi: 10.3390/mi14030496, PMID 36984903.

46. Hiebl V, Schachner D, Ladurner A, Heiss EH, Stangl H, Dirsch VM. Caco-2 cells for measuring intestinal cholesterol transport possibilities and limitations. Biol Proced Online. 2020;22:7. doi: 10.1186/s12575-020-00120-w, PMID 32308567.

47. Gruber S. Realities in cytotoxicity evaluation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1204948. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1204948.

48. Gatto C, Ruzza P, Giurgola L, Honisch C, Rossi O, Romano MR. Comparison of perfluorocarbon liquids cytotoxicity tests: direct contact versus the test on liquid extracts. ACS Omega. 2022;8(1):365-72. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c04697, PMID 36643447.

49. Burkhardt F, Spies BC, Wesemann C, Schirmeister CG, Licht EH, Beuer F. Cytotoxicity of polymers intended for the extrusion-based additive manufacturing of surgical guides. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8121. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11426-y, PMID 35513701.

50. Sharma P, Singh R, Patel D. Hemo compatibility and cytotoxicity assessment of lipid-based nanocarriers for oral drug delivery. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023;15(8):56-62. doi: 10.22159/ijpps.2023v15i8.47852.

51. Kumar A, Devi S, Rajan R. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory potential of phytoconstituent-loaded nanoparticles using RAW 264.7 macrophage model. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2020;13(12):101-6. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2020.v13i12.40125.

52. Shepherd SJ, Issadore D, Mitchell MJ. Microfluidic formulation of nanoparticles for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2021;332:12-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.022.

53. Maeki M, Kimura N, Sato Y. Understanding lipid nanoparticle formation in microfluidic devices. Langmuir. 2020;36(38):11430–8. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01453.

54. Pal S, McClements DJ, Dhar P. Sophorolipids: molecular self-assembly and interfacial stabilization. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;313:102856. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2023.102856.

55. Palos Pinto A, Cordero ML, Dominguez A. Sophorolipid-based nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2023;223:113093. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113093.

56. Wang X, An J, Cao T, Guo M, Han F. Application of biosurfactants in medical sciences. Molecules. 2024;29(11):2606. doi: 10.3390/molecules29112606, PMID 38893481.

57. Lin WK, Lin SJ, Lee WR, Lin CC, Lin WC, Chang HC. Effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants and biological therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria: a network meta-analysis. Biomedicines. 2022;10(9):2152. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092152, PMID 36140253.

58. Xue M, Ma P, Zhang L. Reactive oxygen species-cleavable prodrugs and nanocarriers. Acta Pharmacol Sin B. 2023;13(5):2134-54. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.12.025.

59. Zhang Y, Song T, Feng T, Wan Y, Blum NT, Liu C. Plasmonic modulation of gold nanotheranostics for targeted NIR-II photothermal-augmented immunotherapy. Nano Today. 2020;35:100987. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100987.

60. Gatto C, Ruzza P, Giurgola L, Honisch C, Rossi O, Romano MR. Comparison of perfluorocarbon liquids cytotoxicity tests: direct contact versus the test on liquid extracts. ACS Omega. 2022;8(1):365-72. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c04697, PMID 36643447.

61. Kus M, Ibragimow I, Piotrowska Kempisty H. Caco-2 cell line standardization with pharmaceutical requirements and in vitro model suitability for permeability assays. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(11):2523. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112523, PMID 38004503.

62. Ahn J, Lee JH, Choi JR. Microfluidics in nanoparticle drug delivery: from synthesis to preclinical assessment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;134:20-44. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.005.

63. Jia F, Gao Y, Wang H. Recent advances in drug delivery system fabricated by microfluidics for disease therapy. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9(11):625. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9110625, PMID 36354536.

64. Kim J, Kim HY, Song Y. Reactive oxygen species–responsive thioketal nanoparticles for inflammation-targeted drug delivery. J Control Release. 2020;327:684-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.034.

65. Zhang M, Sun Q, Liu Y, Chu Z, Yu L, Hou Y. Controllable ligand spacing stimulates cellular mechanotransduction and promotes stem cell osteogenic differentiation on soft hydrogels. Biomaterials Biomaterials. 2021;268:120543. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120543, PMID 33260094.

66. Chen H, Zhang W, Zhu G. ROS-triggered disassembly of nanocarriers for inflammation-targeted therapy. Acta Biomater. 2022;140:269-81. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.12.030.

67. Ahn J, Lee JH, Kim H. Surface-engineered nanoparticles for enhanced intestinal mucus penetration. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(20):2100645. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202100645.

68. Bae IY, Choi W, Oh SJ, Kim C, Kim SH. TIMP-1-expressing breast tumor spheroids for the evaluation of drug penetration and efficacy. Bioeng Transl Med. 2022;7(2):e10286. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10286, PMID 35600659.

69. Halpern BS, Frazier M, Potapenko J, Casey KS, Koenig K, Longo C. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7615. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8615, PMID 26172980.

70. Xu Q, Boylan NJ, Cai S. Scalable method to produce mucus-penetrating nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(32):19086-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006945117.

71. Araujo F, Shrestha N, Shahbazi MA. Intestinal permeability enhancement of nanocarriers without epithelial damage. Mol Pharm. 2021;18(8):3034-46. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00356.

72. Patel S, Shah R, Mehta T. In vitro cytotoxicity, hemocompatibility, and cellular uptake evaluation of lipid-based nanocarriers for oral drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2022;620:121731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121731.

73. Tjakra M, De Sousa IP, Yang M. Predicting oral nanoparticle permeability using mucus and Caco-2 models. Mol Pharm. 2024;21(7):1724-35. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c00298.

74. Picart L, Mazel V, Moulin A, Bourgeaux V, Tchoreloff P. Influence of the punch shape on the core and shell structure of press-coated tablets. Int J Pharm. 2022;623:121930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121930, PMID 35716982.

75. Chand P, Kumar H, Badduri N, Gupta NV, Bettada VG, Madhunapantula SV. Design and evaluation of cabazitaxel-loaded NLCs against breast cancer cell lines. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;199:111535. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111535, PMID 33360926.

Published

07-03-2026

How to Cite

PRADEEPA, T., & KALIYAPERUMAL, R. (2026). SMART BIOSURFACTANT NANOCARRIERS: ROS-LABILE ORAL DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED CELECOXIB EFFICACY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 18(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2026v18i2.57021

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.