COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE TREATED WITH PHILOS AND K-WIRE FIXATION

Authors

  • MUDIT KUMAR SHARMA Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India
  • JAGDEEP SINGH REHNCY Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India
  • HARJIT KANWAR SINGH CHAWLA Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India
  • JASKIRAT SINGH Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4751-2226
  • GIRISH SAHNI Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India
  • HARSH KUMAR Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-3668
  • MUKUL SHARMA Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India
  • ABHISHEK Department of Orthopaedics, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2025v17i4.7016

Keywords:

Proximal humerus fractures, Proximal humeral internal locking system, K-wire fixation, NEER classification, Constant scores

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the functional outcomes associated with the treatment of proximal humerus fractures utilizing PHILOS (Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System) and K-wire fixation techniques.

Methods: This study enrolled patients with displaced proximal third humeral fractures requiring internal fixation, randomly assigning them to either PHILOS or K-wire fixation. Inclusion criteria included skeletal maturity and informed consent, while exclusions involved skeletal immaturity and medically unfit patients. Preoperative assessments included demographic data, medical history, and radiographic evaluations. The surgical procedure utilized the deltopectoral approach, followed by immobilization and a structured rehabilitation program. Postoperative follow-ups included radiographs at specified intervals. Data were analyzed using SPSS software.

Results: The demographic analysis revealed a similar age distribution (mean age ~50 y) and gender ratio in both groups, with falls being the primary injury mechanism. Significant differences in operative times were noted, with Group 1 averaging 92.67 min and Group 2 71.00 min (p<0.0001). Radiological union times were comparable, averaging 15.33 w for Group 1 and 14.93 w for Group 2 (p = 0.6226). Both groups showed improvements in Constant scores over time, with significant differences at 3 and 6 mo post-operative, indicating effective recovery in both groups.

Conclusion: This study found significant differences in operative times between PHILOS and K-wire groups, with comparable radiological union times and similar NEER classification distributions. Both groups showed notable improvements in Constant scores at three and six months post-operatively, highlighting the need for further research to enhance surgical techniques and patient care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, Pollock RG. Fractures of the proximal humerus. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, editors. Fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 1055-107.

2. Harshwardhan H, Verma BP. Functional outcome of proximal humerus fracture treated with proximal humerus interlocking system plating. Int J Res Orthop. 2019;5(5):936-8. doi: 10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20193838.

3. VS Kishore J, Tonape P. Clinical and functional outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated with locking compression plate (LCP) in adults a prospective study. IJOS. 2020;6(4):328-35. doi: 10.18231/j.ijos.2020.060.

4. Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(5):285-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00932316, PMID 2789504.

5. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Sep;52(6):1077-89. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197052060-00001, PMID 5455339.

6. Szyszkowitz R, Seggl W, Schleifer P, Cundy PJ. Proximal humeral fractures management techniques and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(292):13-25. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199307000-00005, PMID 8519100.

7. Cofield RH. Comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;230:49-57. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198805000-00006, PMID 3284683.

8. Baker HP, Gutbrod J, Strelzow JA, Maassen NH, Shi L. Management of proximal humerus fractures in adults a scoping review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6140. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206140, PMID 36294459.

9. Anshuman K, Patnaik G. A comparative study of closed reduction and fixation with percutaneous K-wires versus open reduction and internal fixation with philos plate for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Int J Orthop. 2018;4(3):398-407.

10. Agrawal U, K VB, Rao HK, R PK, Narayandas DK. Assessment of functional outcome and postoperative complications in proximal humerus fracture patients managed with proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) plating. Cureus. 2024;16(6):e63250. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63250, PMID 39070483.

11. Akbar H, Faheem U, Khan BH, Bajwa Z, Umar F, Hussain S. Comparison of the functional outcome of philos plate vs. external fixator in the management of proximal humerus fracture. World J Adv Res Rev. 2024;23(1):1795-801. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.1.2106.

12. Kumar V, Prasad V, Chandran CU, Anshuman K. A comparative study to assess the functional outcome in proximal humerus fractures treated surgically with philos plate (Proximal humerus internal locking system) and percutaneous k-wire fixation. Int J Orthop. 2022;8(3):303-9.

13. Singh CM. Outcome of proximal humeral fracture fixation with K wires vs philos plating. IJOTSS. 2020;6(1):18-21. doi: 10.47618/IJOTSS/v6i1.4.

14. Ganesh DG, Babu DH, Chandrsekharan DN, M V, Subash DY. Prospective study to assess functional outcome in proximal humerus fracture treated using philos. Int J Orthop Sci. 2023;9(1):37-41. doi: 10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i1a.3277.

15. Edelmann K, Obruba P, Kopp L, Cihlar J, Celko AM. Comparison of functional outcomes in angle stable osteosynthesis of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus with those in percutaneous kirschner wire fixation a prospective study of mid-term results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011 Jan 1;78(4):314-20. doi: 10.55095/achot2011/048, PMID 21888841.

Published

15-07-2025

How to Cite

SHARMA, MUDIT KUMAR, et al. “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE TREATED WITH PHILOS AND K-WIRE FIXATION”. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 17, no. 4, July 2025, pp. 79-82, doi:10.22159/ijcpr.2025v17i4.7016.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Most read articles by the same author(s)