COMPARISON BETWEEN ISOFLURANE AND SEVOFLURANE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF HYPOTENSIVE ANAESTHESIA IN ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2025v17i6.7066Keywords:
Sevoflurane, Isoflurane, Endoscopic sinus surgery, Hypotensive anaesthesiaAbstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of isoflurane and sevoflurane in maintaining controlled hypotensive anesthesia during ESS, focusing on intraoperative hemodynamics, blood loss, surgical field quality, recovery profile, and postoperative pain.
Methods: This prospective randomized study included 80 ASA I/II patients aged 18–60 undergoing elective ESS. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received isoflurane and Group S received sevoflurane. Hemodynamic parameters (MAP, HR), blood loss, surgical field visibility, recovery times, and postoperative pain (VAS scores) were recorded and analyzed statistically.
Results: Sevoflurane significantly maintained lower MAP and HR during surgery (p<0.05) and was associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss (110.6±18.9 ml vs. 135.2±20.3 ml; p = 0.001) and improved surgical field scores (p = 0.002). Recovery was faster in Group S across all parameters, including eye opening, extubation, and orientation (p<0.001). Postoperative pain scores were consistently lower in the sevoflurane group during the early recovery period (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Sevoflurane proved superior to isoflurane in achieving controlled hypotension, reducing blood loss, improving the surgical field, enhancing recovery profile, and minimizing early postoperative pain in patients undergoing ESS. It is therefore a preferred agent for maintaining hypotensive anesthesia in such procedures.
Downloads
References
1. Messerklinger W. Technics and possibilities of nasal endoscopy. HNO. 1972 May;20(5):133-5. PMID 5049779.
2. Min HK, Lee S, Kim S, Son Y, Park J, Kim HJ. Global incidence and prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review. Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Jan;55(1):52-66. doi: 10.1111/cea.14592, PMID 39506931.
3. Jain D. Clinico-epidemiological and radiological study of chronic rhinosinusitis in Western Maharashtra. Indian J Appl Res. 2017;7(4):145-6.
4. Gardner WJ. The control of bleeding during an operation by induced hypotension. J Am Med Assoc. 1946 Nov 9;132(10):572-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.1946.02870450026007, PMID 21001599.
5. Noori F, Emami MR, Nakhaee P, Mohri M. Comparison of two anesthetic inhalant agents (isoflurane and sevoflurane) on induction and recovery from anesthesia physiological effects hematocrit and biochemistry profiles in domestic pigeons (Columba livia domestica). J Poult Sci Avian Dis. 2023;1(2):18-27. doi: 10.61838/kman.jpsad.1.2.3.
6. Eger EI. The pharmacology of isoflurane. Br J Anaesth. 1984;56 Suppl 1:71S-99S. PMID 6391530.
7. De Hert S, Moerman A. Sevoflurane. F1000Res. 2015 Aug 25;4:626. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6288.1, PMID 26380072.
8. Ozkiris M, Kapusuz Z, Ozturk S, Bolat E, Saydam L. The effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane in nasal septal surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Mar;24(2):592-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182802029, PMID 23524751.
9. Ahsan B, Masaeli M, Majedi MA, Ghaderi E, Faraji T. Maintenance of anesthesia in paranasal endoscopic sinus surgery: sevoflurane or isoflurane? Which one is better? J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2022;11(1):e122247. doi: 10.5812/jcrps-122247.
10. Sivaci R, Yilmaz MD, Balci C, Erincler T, Unlu H. Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia by means of blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery. Saudi Med J. 2004 Dec;25(12):1995-8. PMID 15711683.
11. Cantillo J, Goldberg ME, Larijani GE, Vekeman D. Recovery parameters after sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia. Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Jul-Aug;17(4):779-82. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1997.tb03755.x, PMID 9250557.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.