A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF FIXATION OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES WITH DYNAMIC HIP SCREW FIXATION OR PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING FIXATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2025v17i6.7092Keywords:
Injury, Elderly, Intertrochanteric, Proximal femoral nailing, Dynamic hip screwAbstract
Objective: Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the most common and most devastating injuries in the elderly. With the tremendous improvements achieved in the field of medicine over the decades, life span of an individual has also increased. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture is by both non-operative and operative methods.
Methods: This is a prospective study of 30 cases of intertrochanteric fractures treated by early surgical fixation with Dynamic hip screw fixation or proximal femoral nailing. The period of survey and follow-up extends from oct 2020 to march 2022. Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to assess functional outcome.
Results: The mean age of the PFN group was 61.9+10.49 years, whereas the mean age for DHS group was 61.63+9.02 years. The PFN group had a higher HHS score in the current investigation and an intergroup comparison of the Harris Hip score between the PFN and DHS groups revealed significant differences at each follow-up period.
Conclusion: The PFN is a better alternative of fixation in patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures in terms of functional outcome.
Downloads
References
1. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton III LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992 Nov;2(6):285-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01623184, PMID 1421796.
2. Zickel RE. A new fixation device for subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1967 Sep 1;54:115-23. PMID 5589594.
3. Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN) a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Jan 1;74(1):53-8. doi: 10.1080/00016470310013662, PMID 12635794.
4. Fox KM, Cummings SR, Williams E, Stone K, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures have different risk factors: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(12):1018-23. doi: 10.1007/s001980070022, PMID 11256892.
5. Vidyadhara S, Rao SK, Pandian S, Gnanadoss J. Closing lateral wedge valgus osteotomy with dynamic hip screw for the treatment of varus nonunion of pertrochanteric fracture: can restoration of biomechanics and stabilization alone heal? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jun;129(6):827-32. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0791-7, PMID 19107496.
6. Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN) a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Jan 1;74(1):53-8. doi: 10.1080/00016470310013662, PMID 12635794.
7. Clawson DK. Trochanteric fractures treated by the sliding screw plate fixation method. J Trauma. 1964 Nov 1;4(6):737-52. doi: 10.1097/00005373-196411000-00001, PMID 14225321.
8. Suranigi SM, Shetty N, Shah HM. Study comparing the advantages of proximal femoral nail over dynamic hip screw among patients with subtrochantric fracture. J Med Thesis. 2014;2(1):35-8.
9. Kumar R, Singh RN, Singh BN. Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun 1;3(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2011.12.001, PMID 25983453.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.