COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SACUBITRIL/VALSARTAN VERSUS ACE INHIBITORS OR ARBS IN ACHIEVING TARGET BLOOD PRESSURE AMONG ADULTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2025v17i12.56600

Keywords:

Sacubitril, Valsartan, ARNI, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, Hypertension, Blood pressure control, Meta-analysis, Randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in achieving blood pressure (BP) control (<140/90 mmHg) among adults with hypertension.

Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sacubitril/valsartan with ACEIs or ARBs in adult hypertensive patients and reporting the proportion of individuals achieving target BP were included. Four eligible RCTs were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. A random-effects model was employed to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: The pooled analysis demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan was significantly more effective than ACEIs or ARBs in achieving BP control, with a pooled RR of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.14–1.35). Heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 58.2%), and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. No significant publication bias was detected through Egger’s regression or funnel plot inspection. The overall certainty of the evidence was rated as moderate.

Conclusion: Sacubitril/valsartan improves the likelihood of achieving target blood pressure levels compared to ACEIs or ARBs in adults with hypertension. These findings support the potential of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) as a more effective therapeutic option in contemporary hypertension management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. World Health Organization. Hypertension. In: Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension.

2. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(4):223-37. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2, PMID 32024986.

3. Carey RM, Muntner P, Bosworth HB, Whelton PK. Prevention and control of hypertension: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(11):1278-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.008, PMID 30190007.

4. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb CD. A guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2017;71(6):e13-5. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065, PMID 29133356.

5. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339, PMID 30165516.

6. Burnier M, Egan BM. Adherence in hypertension. Circ Res. 2019;124(7):1124-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313220, PMID 30920917.

7. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR. Angiotensin neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077, PMID 25176015.

8. Kario K, Williams B. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors for hypertension hemodynamic effects and relevance to hypertensive heart disease. Hypertens Res. 2022 Jul;45(7):1097-110. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-00923-2, PMID 35501475.

9. Kario K, Sun N, Chiang FT, Supasyndh O, Baek SH, Inubushi Molessa A. Efficacy and safety of LCZ696 a first-in-class ARNI, in Asian patients with hypertension: a randomized double-blind study. Hypertens Res. 2020;43(9):1012-21. doi: 10.1038/s41440-020-0482-9, PMID 24446062.

10. Kolte D. Transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repair for functional tricuspid regurgitation: does aetiology matter. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(9):1126-8. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1588, PMID 31407846.

11. Xie B, Gao Q, Wang Y, Du J, He Y. Effect of sacubitril valsartan on left ventricular remodeling and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure complicated with hypertension and reduced ejection fraction. Am J Transl Res. 2024 May 15;16(5):1935-44. doi: 10.62347/KHQW5375, PMID 38883372.

12. Gu J, Noe A, Chandra P, Al Fayoumi S, Ligueros Saylan M, Sarangapani R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LCZ696, a novel dual-acting angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi). J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;50(4):401-14. doi: 10.1177/0091270009343932, PMID 19934029.

13. Mishra S, Patel CJ, Patel MM. Development and validation of stability indicating chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of sacubitril and valsartan in pharmaceutical dosage form. Int J App Pharm. 2017;9(5):1-8. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2017v9i5.19139.

14. Modi JK, Yadav M. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockers in stage 1 hypertension: a hospital-based observational study. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2025;18(7):236-9. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2025.v18i7.54944.

15. Pandey D, Guleri SK, Sinha U, Pandey S, Tiwari S. Paradigmatic age shift of hypertension disease: a study among young adults. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;16(4):44-9. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i4.47564.

16. Pandey D, Guleri SK, Sinha U, Pandey S, Tiwari S. Paradigmatic age shift of hypertension disease: a study among young adults. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;16(4):44-9. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i4.47564.

17. Sharma S, Kumar Singh SK, Baranwal PK, Singh DK, Kale V. A cross-sectional study to estimate the prevalence of hypertension in urban field practice area of medical college in metropolitan city of India. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(9):98-101. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i9.45926.

18. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71, PMID 33782057.

19. Sterne JA, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898, PMID 31462531.

20. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso Coello P. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD, PMID 18436948.

21. Der Simonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-88. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2, PMID 3802833.

22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557, PMID 12958120.

23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629-34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629, PMID 9310563.

24. Mazza A, Townsend DM, Torin G, Schiavon L, Camerotto A, Rigatelli G. The role of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in hypertensive patients with comorbidities: from clinical trials to real-world settings. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Oct 1;130:110596. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110596, PMID 34321170.

25. Gao J, Zhang X, Xu M, Deng S, Chen X. The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared with ACEI/ARB in the treatment of heart failure following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 4;14:1237210. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237210, PMID 37601056.

26. Jackson AM, Jhund PS, Anand IS, Dungen HD, Lam CS, Lefkowitz MP. Sacubitril valsartan as a treatment for apparent resistant hypertension in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3741-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab499, PMID 34392331.

Published

01-12-2025

How to Cite

DAS, PRANAB. “COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF SACUBITRIL VALSARTAN VERSUS ACE INHIBITORS OR ARBS IN ACHIEVING TARGET BLOOD PRESSURE AMONG ADULTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 17, no. 12, Dec. 2025, pp. 49-56, doi:10.22159/ijpps.2025v17i12.56600.

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.