A VALIDATED ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR RANITIDINE HCL THROUGH LC-MS/MS, HPLC AND QUALITY BY DESIGN APPROACH.

Authors

  • DEBANGANA PAL Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Ooty, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8262-9237
  • BABU B. Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Ooty, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India
  • SM. HABIBUR RAHMAN PSG College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2609-4677
  • KALIRAJAN R. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Ooty, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3382-4316
  • CHANDAN C. Department of Biochemistry, The Oxford College of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3966-1311

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2025v17i6.55652

Keywords:

Analytical method development, Method validation, ICH, Ranitidine HCl, QbD

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to develop and validate simple, precise, and highly sensitive LC-MS/MS and HPLC methodologies for the quantitative estimation of Ranitidine HCl in pharmaceutical formulations. The goal was to develop a speedy and dependable technique for routine quality control and regulatory analysis.

Methods: Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Atlantis C18 column (150×4.6 mm, 5µm) under isocratic elution mode. The mobile phase consisted of 10 mmol ammonium acetate (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B) in a 10:90 v/v ratio, delivered at a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min. An injection volume of 10µl* was employed, and the run time was 4 min. Ranitidine HCl was eluted at 1.993 min. The method was validated in accordance with ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines for parameters including linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and robustness.

Results: The LC-MS/MS method showed excellent linearity across a concentration range of 5-250 ng/ml with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9998. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined to be 1.0 ng/ml and 3.0 ng/ml, respectively. Recovery ranged from 95.33% to 97.93% and relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.69%, confirming the method’s accuracy and precision.

Conclusion: The validated LC-MS/MS and HPLC methods are simple and sensitive for the quantification of ranitidine HCl. Both techniques demonstrated robust performance with high accuracy and precision. Their successful application to a commercial formulation confirms their suitability for pharmaceutical quality control and supports regulatory compliance in the routine analysis of ranitidine HCl products.

References

1. Brunton LL, Hilal Dandan R, Knollmann BC. Goodman and Gilman’s: the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.

2. Trifkovic M, Rohani S, Mirmehrabi M. Polymorphic generation through solvent selection: ranitidine hydrochloride. Org Process Res Dev. 2007;11(1):138-43. doi: 10.1021/op060011y.

3. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Some nitrosamines and related compounds. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2010;94:1-500.

4. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA requests removal of all ranitidine products (Zantac) from the market. FDA Press Announcement; 2020 Apr 1. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements.

5. European Medicines Agency. Ranitidine medicines: suspension due to impurity with NDMA. EMA; 2020. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu.

6. Gao Z, Xu X, Ding Y, Wang Y, Gao N. Mechanistic insight into the formation of NDMA from ranitidine: reaction pathways and kinetics. Chem Res Toxicol. 2020;33(9):2290-7. doi: 10.1021/acschemrestox.0c00236.

7. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA requests removal of all ranitidine products (Zantac) from the market. FDA Press Announcement; 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements.

8. European Medicines Agency. EMA recommends precautionary suspension of ranitidine medicines in the EU. EMA; 2020. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu.

9. Dobariya U, Chauhan N, Patel H, Pardeshi N. Nitrosamine impurities: origin control and regulatory recommendations. Int J Drug Reg Affairs. 2021;9(2):77-80. doi: 10.22270/ijdra.v9i2.472.

10. Health Canada. NDMA in ranitidine products. Health Canada Advisory; 2019. Available from: https://www.canada.Ca/en.health-canada/services/drugs-health-products.html.

11. Hu Q, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang S. LC-MS/MS determination of NDMA in ranitidine using isotope dilution method. J Chromatogr B. 2020;1138:121930. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121930.

12. Rathore AS, Winkle H. Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(1):26-34. doi: 10.1038/nbt0109-26, PMID 19131992.

13. Hao W, Wang SF, Zhao J, Li SP. Effects of extraction methods on immunology activity and chemical profiles of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020;185:113219. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113219, PMID 32145536.

14. Wu Y, Sun L, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Han J, Wang Y. Quantitation of N-nitrosodimethylamine in pharmaceutical products by high resolution mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2020;92(6):4071-8.

15. Dixit RP, Jain DK, Waghule AB. Shende VS. HPLC method development and validation for estimation of ranitidine and related substances. Indian Drugs. 2018;55(4):45-50.

16. Nagaich U. Pharmaceutical quality by design approach. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2018;9(1):1. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_343_17, PMID 29441316.

17. Pramod K, Tahir MA, Charoo NA, Ansari SH, Ali J. Pharmaceutical product development: a quality by design approach. Int J Pharm Investig. 2016;6(3):129-38. doi: 10.4103/2230-973X.187350, PMID 27606256.

18. Sarraguça MC, Lopes JA. Quality by Design (QbD) in pharmaceutical industry: design of experiments (DoE). Braz J Pharm Sci. 2019;55:e18105. doi: 10.1590/s2175-97902019000118105.

19. Ferreira SL, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandao GC. Box–behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;597(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011, PMID 17683728.

20. Kadry H, Abou Basha L, El Gindi O, Temraz A. Antioxidant activity of aerial parts of Tribulus alatus in rats. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2010;23(1):59-62. PMID 20067868.

21. Suthar A, Hamarapurkar P, Patil P, Phale M, Katkar K, Mundada G. Simultaneous RP-HPLC quantification of vasicine and vasicinone in Adhatoda vasica and its formulation. Acta Chromatogr. 2010;22(4):599-608. doi: 10.1556/AChrom.22.2010.4.9.

22. Rathore AS, Winkle H. Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(1):26-34. doi: 10.1038/nbt0109-26, PMID 19131992.

23. Nagaich U. Pharmaceutical quality by design approach. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2018;9(1):1. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_343_17, PMID 29441316.

24. Rajesh R. Stability indicating RP-HPLC method development and validation for the analysis of doxepin hydrochloride in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2024;16(4):27-35. doi: 10.22159/ijpps.2024v16i4.50126.

25. Katolkar P, Jaiswal S. Analytical method development and validation for the estimation of cyamemazine tartrate in formulation by RP-HPLC with stability indicating. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(9):28-32. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i9.45154.

26. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human use. Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology. Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. 1996 Nov;Q2:R1.

27. Kumar N, Singh D, Singh N. Development and validation of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the estimation of drugs in biological samples. J Appl Pharm Technol Res. 2015;4(3):116-21.

28. Swamy MK, Anitha V, Gopalakrishnan M. Analytical method development and validation: a concise review. J Pharm Anal. 2014;4(3):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2013.12.004.

29. Sarraguca MC, Lopes JA. Quality by design (QbD) in the pharmaceutical industry: design of experiments (DoE). Braz J Pharm Sci. 2019;55:e18105. doi: 10.1590/s2175-97902019000118105.

30. Ferreira SL, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandao GC. Box–behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;597(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011, PMID 17683728.

31. Atmakuru R, Pandiselvi V, Sathiyanarayanan S, Ayyappan S. Investigations on the photolysis of imazethapyr in aqueous solutions under direct sunlight by HPLC UV and LC-MS/MS-ESI – applications of green alga as a potential biomarker. Int J Chem Res. 2012;3(1):45-51.

32. Chandan C, Agalave RS, Tyagi T, Singh AK, Ramesh J, Phani Kumar G. LC-MS/MS-based quantitative profiling of papain enzyme in Carica papaya L.: method development and validation. Int J App Pharm. 2024;16(2):86-91. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2024v16i2.49921.

33. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human use. Assessment and control of DNA-reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. ICH Harmonised Guideline. 2017 Mar;M7:R1.

34. Gandhi SV, Jagtap M. Development and validation of stability indicating HPTLC method for determination of iguratimod in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2022;14(11):31-6. doi: 10.22159/ijpps.2022v14i11.45705.

35. Chandraju S, Mythily R, Kumar CS. Preparative HPLC separation of sugars extracted from non-edible portion of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula) and their identification by mass and TLC analysis. Int J Chem Res. 2012;3(1):40-4.

36. Parmar I, Patel YA. Recent method development by analytical techniques of new FDA-approved drugs in 2021. Int J Curr Pharm Sci. 2022;14(3):17-21. doi: 10.22159/ijcpr.2022v14i3.1975.

37. Dhondt L, Croubels S, De Cock P, Dhont E, De Baere S, De Paepe P. Volumetric absorptive microsampling as alternative sampling technique for renal function assessment in the paediatric population using iohexol. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2021;1171:122623. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122623, PMID 33735803.

38. Patel NK, Shah RH. Quality by design-based development and validation of LC-MS/MS method for estimation of ranitidine and its impurities. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2024;240:115837. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2024.115837.

39. Chen L, Ma Y, Wang H. Comparative evaluation of HPLC and LC-MS/MS for the determination of ranitidine and related compounds. J Sep Sci. 2022;45(5):1014-22. doi: 10.1002/jssc.202100957.

40. Wang J, Xu L, Qian L. Application of QbD approach for HPLC method optimization of ranitidine hydrochloride. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2021;13(2):12-8. doi: 10.22159/ijcpr.2021v13i2.1931.

41. Jain A, Kaur R, Verma S. A validated stability-indicating HPLC method for the determination of ranitidine under stress degradation conditions. Acta Pharm Sci. 2023;61(1):73-81. doi: 10.23893/1307-2080.

42. Kaur P, Sharma R, Singh G. Development of an HPLC method for analysis of ranitidine in pharmaceutical formulations. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2021;11(7):100-5. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2021.11713.

43. Zhang Q, Li W, Sun Y. Simultaneous quantification of ranitidine and NDMA using a validated LC-MS/MS method in accordance with ICH M7 guidelines. Pharm Chem J. 2020;54(9):767-74. doi: 10.1007/s11094-020-02193-9.

Published

07-11-2025

How to Cite

PAL, D., B., B., RAHMAN, S. H., R., K., & C., C. (2025). A VALIDATED ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR RANITIDINE HCL THROUGH LC-MS/MS, HPLC AND QUALITY BY DESIGN APPROACH. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 17(6), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2025v17i6.55652

Issue

Section

Original Article(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.