Undergraduate Students’ Intrinsic Motivation and Learning Outcome in General Genetics (BTC 214) Using Technology-Mediated Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Approaches

Victor Oluwatosin Ajayi; Bibiana Mwuese Penda; Christina Tanko Audu

doi:10.22159/ijoe.2026v14i1.57314

Authors

Victor Oluwatosin Ajayi Department of Chemistry Education, Kwara State University of Education, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7107-4486
Bibiana Mwuese Penda Department of Science Education, Federal University Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria
Christina Tanko Audu Department of Science Education, Taraba State University, Jalingo, Taraba State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2026v14i1.57314

Keywords:

technology-mediated pedagogies, synchronous learning approach, asynchronous learning approach, intrinsic motivation, learning outcome, general genetics course (BTC 214)

Abstract

This study investigates how technology-mediated learning, specifically synchronous (real-time) and asynchronous (self-paced) approaches, impacts undergraduate students’ intrinsic motivation and learning outcomes in a general genetics course (BTC 214). The research design adopted in this study is a quasi-experimental, non-randomized, pre-test/post-test, control-group design. The Intrinsic Motivation Scale (IMS) and General Genetics Learning Outcome Test (GGLOT) are the instruments used for data collection. IMS and GGLOT were validated and trial-tested, yielding reliability values of 0.89 and 0.94, respectively, using Cronbach’s alpha and the Kuder-Richardson (KR-21) formula. This quasi-experimental study employed a convenience sample of intact class groups, comprising all 137 undergraduate students enrolled in Biology and Biology Education (200 level) at Federal University Lokoja, Nigeria during the 2024/2025 session. Four research questions and four null hypotheses guided the study. The research questions were answered using M and SD scores, and the null hypotheses were tested using analysis of covariance. It was established among others that there was a significant difference in the mean intrinsic motivation ratings and learning outcome scores of undergraduate students taught general genetics using synchronous learning approach (SLA), asynchronous learning approach (ALA), and modified lecture method (MLM) F(2, 130) = 95.06, p < .05 and F(2, 130) = 164.00, p < .05 respectively. It was recommended that lecturers be encouraged to use technology-mediated pedagogies (TMPs), such as SLA and ALA, to elevate undergraduate students’ intrinsic motivation and learning outcomes in general genetics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajayi, V. O. (2019). Effects of predict-explain-observe-explain and vee heuristic strategies on students’ achievement, metacognitive awareness and self-efficacy belief in organic chemistry in Ekiti State, Nigeria. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3587073

Ajayi, V. O., Achimugu, L., & Audu, C. T. (2025). Ameliorating students’ cognitive engagement and critical thinking in chemistry: Testing the potency of practical-based and discussion-based. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.04216

Ajayi, V. O., Ameh, R. F., & Alabi, A. O. (2025). Enhancing students’ self-confidence and critical thinking ability in identifying physical and chemical changes using technology-assisted constructivist approaches. Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.56855/jrsme.v4i1.1367

Ajayi, V. O., Ameh, R. F., & Penda, B. M. (2025). An online survey of science educators’ challenges of implementing digital pedagogy in public universities in Kogi State, Nigeria. Journal of Advanced Research in Education, 4(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56397/JARE.2025.09.01

Aque, A., Barquilla, M., Buan, A., & Bagaloyos, J. (2021). Asynchronous learning: Its effects on academic performance and students’ motivation in science. Thabiea, 4(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v4i1.9806

Chafouk, O., & Marjanei, D. (2024). Comparing the impact of synchronous and asynchronous online learning on student retention and satisfaction. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(11), 270–292. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i11.5605

Chen, X., & Siau, K. (2016). Technology-mediated synchronous virtual education: An Empirical Study. Journal of Database Management, 27(4), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2016100103

Di Domenico, S. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The emerging neuroscience of intrinsic motivation: A new frontier in self-determination research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145

Eminue, U. O., Garba, A., & Njoku, C. I. (2020). Adoption of synchronous instructional strategies and students’ academic performance in accounting in secondary schools in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(1), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3710529

Federal University. (2024, November 8). Lokoja. Federal University Lokoja Facts and Figures: Students’ Enrollment Rate. Federal University Lokoja’s post. Retrieved July 15, 2025, from https://bit.ly/4nf8OzE

Hashim, H., Hasan, N.H., & Shafeei, K.N. (2023). Students’ engagement and learning motivation in synchronous and asynchronous open distance learning (ODL) activities. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science, 6(3), 292-302.

Liu, F., Wang, X., & Izadpanah, S. (2023). The Comparison of the efficiency of the lecture method and flipped classroom instruction method on EFL students’ academic passion and responsibility. Sage Open, 13(2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231174355

Lowe, H. (2024). Effects of synchronous vs. asynchronous learning on student performance in distance education. American Journal of Online and Distance Learning, 6(2), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajodl.2321

Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 228–261. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174

Martínez-Huamán, E. L., Añazco, C. Q., Quispe, S. C., & Gutiérrez-Pérez, B. N. (2023). Teaching with chunking in synchronous classes: The influence on university students’ intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.21

Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon: A Cell Press Journal. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e16348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348

Motycka, C. A., Onge, E. L., & Williams, J. S. (2013). Asynchronous versus synchronous learning in pharmacy education. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v2n1p63

Niaz, M. (2002). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074044

Nsikak-Abasi, U., & Udeme, E. T. (2021). Effect of asynchronous instructional strategy on learning motivation and scores of postgraduate students in advanced educational research in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 9(7), 40–50. https://bit.ly/3KYd1dC

Paul, A. O. (2023). Dealing with biology students’ fear of genetics: Computer assisted instruction (CAI) to the rescue. Educational Research, 9(4), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.14303/er.2018.224

Prudente, V. L. (2023). Synchronous learning approach in enhancing the academic performance of grade three pupils in science. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(4), 957–961. https://bit.ly/3LhRQDl

Qamar, A. M., Nadeem, H. A., & Saqib, M. U. (2025). Effect of asynchronous learning on students’ academic achievement in chemistry at the secondary level. ProScholar Insights, 4(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.62997/psi.2025a-41038

Secreto, P. V., & Tabo, E. C. (2023). Impact of synchronous class attendance on the academic performance of undergraduate students. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 4(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.53378/352968

Sulaiman, A., & Al-Shuaili, T. (2025). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of academic achievement and learning attitudes: Evidence from Omani schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 20(6), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2025.4474

Sunnasy, A., & van der Heever, M. M. (2025). Technology-mediated education: The lived experiences of nurse educators. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 23, Article 100885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100885

Zingaro, D., & Oztok, M. (2012). Interaction in an asynchronous online course: A synthesis of quantitative predictors. Online Learning, 16(4), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i4.265