Improving Teacher Competence Through Open Inquiry-Based Scientific Investigation Development Training

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2025v13i3.53809

Keywords:

teacher competence, open inquiry, scientific investigation, teacher training

Abstract

This research aims to improve science teachers’ competence in formulating problems, determining investigation variables, drawing conclusions, interpreting tables, and interpreting graphs through training in developing open inquiry-based scientific investigations. The research design uses a quasi-experimental approach with pre-test and post-test to measure changes in competencies by Ten (10) teachers before and after participating in the training. The study showed a significant improvement in teachers’ skills after participating in the training. Teachers can better formulate investigation problems, determine relevant variables, draw the correct conclusions, and interpret data in tables and graphs. Despite the challenges in implementing the training, such as time and resource management, this training has proven to be effective in improving science teachers’ competence in designing and implementing open inquiry-based learning. This research contributes to developing teacher competencies in the future and scientific inquiry-based learning in Indonesia, which is expected to improve the quality of education and students’ critical thinking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acar, O. A., & Tuncdogan, A. (2019). Using the inquiry-based learning approach to enhance student innovativeness: A conceptual model. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(7), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1516636

Adler, I., Zion, M., & Rimerman-Shmueli, E. (2019). Fostering teachers’ reflections on the dynamic characteristics of open inquiry through metacognitive prompts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 763–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1627060

Afandi, Sajidan, Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21 st -century skills standards for prospective science teachers: A Delphi study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647

Alsufyani, A. A. (2023). “Scie-losophy” a teaching and learning framework for the reconciliation of the P4C and the scientific method. MethodsX, 11, 102417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102417

Ames, H., Glenton, C., & Lewin, S. (2019). Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0665-4

Baroudi, S., & Rodjan Helder, M. (2021). Behind the scenes: Teachers’ perspectives on factors affecting the implementation of inquiry-based science instruction. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1651259

Börner, K., Bueckle, A., & Ginda, M. (2019). Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(6), 1857–1864. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807180116

Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1996). Education, globalization and economic development. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093960110101

Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660927

Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x

Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., & Casas, R. (2021). Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-Create-Learn, a tool for teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761

Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2021). The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266

Chusni, M. M., Saputro, S., Surant, S., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2022). Enhancing critical thinking skills of junior high school students through discovery-based multiple representations learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 927–945. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15153a

Cigdemoglu, C., & Köseoğlu, F. (2019). Improving science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 28(3), 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00054-0

Costes-Onishi, P., Baildon, M., & Aghazadeh, S. (2020). Moving inquiry-based learning forward: A meta-synthesis on inquiry-based classroom practices for pedagogical innovation and school improvement in the humanities and arts. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(4), 552–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1838883

Eckerd, S., DuHadway, S., Bendoly, E., Carter, C. R., & Kaufmann, L. (2021). On making experimental design choices: Discussions on the use and challenges of demand effects, incentives, deception, samples, and vignettes. Journal of Operations Management, 67(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1128

Elfeky, A. I. M., Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622

Fan, Y.-C. (2024). Effectiveness of inquiry-based instructional design for developing the scientific competency and interdisciplinary knowledge of preservice elementary teachers. Science & Education, 33(5), 1309–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00424-9

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A.-T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5

Glaesser, J. (2019). Competence in educational theory and practice: A critical discussion. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1493987

González‐pérez, L. I., & Ramírez‐montoya, M. S. (2022). Competencies types (learning skills, literacy skills, life skills) components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–31.

Indrawati, S. M., & Kuncoro, A. (2021). Improving competitiveness through vocational and higher education: Indonesia’s vision for human capital development in 2019–2024. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1909692

Khaokhajorn, W., & Srisawasdi, N. (2024). Assessing pre-service science teachers ’ understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry to develop a sustainable technology-infused pedagogical program in teacher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2439160

Kirk, R., & E, R. (2009). Experimental design. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (hal. 23–45). Sage.

Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309

Mazibe, E. N., Coetzee, C., & Gaigher, E. (2020). A comparison between reported and enacted pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about graphs of motion. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9718-7

Mulyeni, T., Jamaris, M., & Suprjyati, Y. (2019). Improving basic science process skills through inquiry-based approach in learning science for early elementary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10274a

Mutlu, A. (2020). Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999

Parkhouse, H., Lu, C. Y., & Massaro, V. R. (2019). Multicultural education professional development: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 416–458. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319840359

Podolsky, A., Kini, T., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of US research. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 4(4), 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-12-2018-0032

Rachmadtullah, R., Prasetyo, T., Humaira, M. A., Sari, D. A., Samsudin, A., Nurtanto, M., & Zamzam, R. (2024). Professional development for Indonesian elementary school teachers : Increased competency and sustainable teacher development programs. F1000Research, 13, 1375. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.156946.1

Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1563-5

Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning : assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 13,1045. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1

Saputra, B., & Chaeruman, U. A. (2022). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK): Analysis in Design selection and data analysis techniques in high school. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15442a

Sari, Y. I., Sumarmi, Utomo, D. H., & Astina, I. K. (2021). The effect of problem based learning on problem solving and scientific writing skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1422a

Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Gillet, D., Pelliccione, L., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using educational data from teaching and learning to inform teachers’ reflective educational design in inquiry-based STEM education. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 724–738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.014

Soudani, M. (2024). Epistemological and didactic reflections on teacher training in France. Science & Education, 33(5), 1285–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00420-z

Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-stem project-based learning: Its impact to critical and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21754

Sun, J., Ma, H., Zeng, Y., Han, D., & Jin, Y. (2023). Promoting the AI teaching competency of K-12 computer science teachers: A TPACK-based professional development approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1509–1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11256-5

Taufik, M. S., Solahuddin, S., Pratama, R. R., Iskandar, T., & Ridlo, A. F. (2021). the effect of virtual media-based obstacle run training on woman futsal player’s dribbling ability during COVID-19 pandemic. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 21(4), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2021.4.02

Tho, S. W., Chan, K. W., & Yeung, Y. Y. (2015). Technology-Enhanced physics programme for community-based science learning: Innovative design and programme evaluation in a theme park. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9549-5

Varenina, L., Vecherinina, E., Shchedrina, E., Valiev, I., & Islamov, A. (2021). Retracted: Developing critical thinking skills in a digital educational environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100906

Wang, H. H., Hong, Z. R., She, H. C., Smith, T. J., Fielding, J., & Lin, H. shyang. (2022). The role of structured inquiry, open inquiry, and epistemological beliefs in developing secondary students’ scientific and mathematical literacies. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00329-z

Wardani, S., Kusuma, I. W., Liu, S. T., & Harjito. (2020). Comparison of learning in inductive and deductive approach to increase student’s conceptual understanding based on international standard curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21155

Zahra, A., Soumia, T., & Mohamed, R. (2025). The impact of continuous teacher training based on the flipped classroom on teaching practices and learner performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i1.29989

Published

01-05-2025

How to Cite

Haris, A., & Mahir, M. (2025). Improving Teacher Competence Through Open Inquiry-Based Scientific Investigation Development Training. Innovare Journal of Education, 13(3), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2025v13i3.53809

Issue

Section

Research Article(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.