Diverse Teaching Styles and Classroom Environment as Predictors of Students’ Motivation and Engagement in Physics

Authors

  • Emmanuel Achor Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University, Makurdi, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-0877
  • Barnabas Obiaje Ellah Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University, Makurdi, Nigeria
  • Janeth Asharegh Iorgema Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University, Makurdi, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-0877

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2026v14i3.58522

Keywords:

physics, student motivation, classroom environment, engagement, diverse teaching styles

Abstract

This study explored diverse teaching styles and classroom environment as predictors of students’ motivation and engagement in Physics in secondary schools in Nigeria. The study adopts a correlational survey research design. The study population was 12,250 students. A sample of 1,210 Students was selected. The instruments for data collection are questionnaires designed by the researchers to assess students’ sensitivity to teaching styles, classroom environment, motivation, and engagement in Physics. Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient was used for data analysis. The findings revealed a significant relationship between diverse teaching styles and students’ motivation in physics. There was a significant relationship between diverse teaching styles and students’ engagement in physics. There was a significant relationship between the classroom environment and students’ motivation in physics in secondary schools. There was a significant relationship between the classroom environment and students’ engagement in physics in secondary schools. Based on the findings, it was recommended, among others, that school owners provide adequate school facilities, such as well-built classrooms, to enhance a conducive environment and increase students’ willingness to engage in challenging physics tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullahi, A. (2017). Science teaching in Nigeria. Atoto Press.

Achor, E. E., Ellah, B. O., & Omaga, J. O. (2022). Misconceptions and difficult concepts as determinant of students’ academic engagement and retention in Physics. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 1(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v1i1.17660

Achor, E. E., Ajai, T. J., & Songo, I. G. P. (2024). Status of students’ attitude towards physics when analogy, problem-solving and concept-mapping strategies are used in teaching at senior secondary school level. International Centre for Science, Humanities & Education Research (ICSHER) Journal, 5(5),70-84.

Adeyemo, S. A. (2017). The impact of interactive teaching strategies on student engagement in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 456–463.

Ajayi, K. O., & Ogunyemi, B. (2021). Psychological factors influencing students’ motivation in science classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 98–106.

Barmby, P. (2008). Developing the understanding of the concept of force with secondary school students. Physics Education, 43(6), 507–513.

Christenson, S. L. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 547–576.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2013). Fundamentals of physics (10th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice Hall.

Nwagbo, C. R., & Okoro, C. O. (2018). Effect of guided inquiry and expository teaching methods on students’ achievement in biology. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 53(1), 96–105.

Obomanu, B. J., & Akinbobola, A. O. (2020). Influence of instructional resources on students’ engagement in physics. Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 11(2), 37–45.

Ogunleye, A. O., & Babajide, V. F. (2016). The impact of classroom climate on students’ engagement in physics. African Journal of Educational Research and Development, 8(1), 15–23.

Okebukola, P. A., & Jegede, O. J. (2019). Effects of instruction on cooperative learning and traditional classroom practice on students’ attitudes to science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(8), 684–691.

Wubbels, T. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and student achievement. In T. Wubbels, P. den Brok, J. van Tartwijk, & J. Levy (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 17–33). Sense.

Published

28-03-2026

How to Cite

Achor, E., Ellah, B. O., & Iorgema, J. A. (2026). Diverse Teaching Styles and Classroom Environment as Predictors of Students’ Motivation and Engagement in Physics . Innovare Journal of Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2026v14i3.58522

Issue

Section

Research Article(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.